ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2023
Health Disparities, Clinical Trials, and the Digital Divide.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Reduces Heavy Drinking Among a Non-Treatment Sample of People With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Feasibility Trial With CBT4CBT.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Trial
- Randomized Comparison of Online Motivational Themes in Clinical Trial Recruitment.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Trial
- Usage of an App-Based Addiction Prevention Program for German Vocational Students: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Gamification Elements in Physical Activity Interventions: Scoping Review and Taxonomy Based on the Octalysis Framework.JMIR serious games · 2026Review
- Feasibility of EHR-based prescreening for an adjuvant breast cancer trial in a safety-net health system.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Digital Health Intervention Use in China: National Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An Equity-Embedded, Protocol-Agnostic Pre-Trial Navigation Model for Canadian Blood Cancer Trials: Findings from the Myeloma Canada Phase 0 Workshop.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- CareVR, a Virtual Reality assisted communication training programme to support informal carers of people with psychosis: a feasibility study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study Exploring Diabetes Prevention Intervention Needs and Ideas Among Young Adults at High Risk for Diabetes.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2026Article
- Digitally engaging participants in cancer clinical trials: Design and pilot of the Alliance Participant Engagement Portal (PEP).JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in cardiology in the current era: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Immersive competence as a source of bias in virtual reality clinical assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Health: Yes, They Matter-But What Can We Do to Address Them?Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Impact of broadband availability and digital literacy on video telehealth use among cancer patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging the divide in digital therapeutics (DTx): Partnership strategies for broader representation across DTx development and deployment.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Empowering AI assisted clinical drug development: tactics to address data bias, the digital divide and missing patient populations through AI and digital solutions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Readability of informed consent forms from ClinicalTrials.gov in ketamine clinical trials for mental health conditions: a cross-sectional analysis.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- A Community-Engaged Approach for Assessment of Cortisol Dynamic Range and Multilevel Chronic Stress in African Americans: FAITH! Heart Health+ Ancillary Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Engaging Minoritized Communities in Clinical Trials Through Social Media: Recommendations from Community-Based Participatory Research.Health communication · 2025Article
- Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the past few years, there have been rapid advances in technology and the use of digital tools in health care and clinical research. Although these innovations have immense potential to improve health care delivery and outcomes, there are genuine concerns related to inadvertent widening of the digital gap consequentially exacerbating health disparities. As such, it is important that we critically evaluate the impact of expansive digital transformation in medicine and clinical research on health equity. For digital solutions to truly improve the landscape of health care and clinical trial participation for all persons in an equitable way, targeted interventions to address historic injustices, structural racism, and social and digital determinants of health are essential. The urgent need to focus on interventions to promote health equity was made abundantly clear with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, which magnified long-standing social and racial health disparities. Novel digital technologies present a unique opportunity to embed equity ideals into the ecosystem of health care and clinical research. In this review, we examine racial and ethnic diversity in clinical trials, historic instances of unethical research practices in biomedical research and its impact on clinical trial participation, and the digital divide in health care and clinical research, and we propose suggestions to achieve digital health equity in clinical trials. We also highlight key digital health opportunities in cardiovascular medicine and dermatology as exemplars, and we offer future directions for development and adoption of patient-centric interventions aimed at narrowing the digital divide and mitigating health inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.