Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38052159›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024

New insights into the (epi)genetics of twinning.

Jenny van Dongen, Nikki Hubers, Dorret I Boomsma

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisTwin Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jenny van DongenNetherlands Twin Register, Department of Biological Psychology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-8741
Nikki HubersNetherlands Twin Register, Department of Biological Psychology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dorret I BoomsmaNetherlands Twin Register, Department of Biological Psychology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7099-7972

Funding

Amsterdam Reproduction and Development InstituteRoyal Netherlands Academy of Science Professor PAH/6635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous dizygotic (DZ) twins, i.e. twins conceived without the use of ARTs, run in families and their prevalence varies widely around the globe. In contrast, monozygotic (MZ) twins occur at a constant rate across time and geographical regions and, with some rare exceptions, do not cluster in families. The leading hypothesis for MZ twins, which arise when a zygote splits during preimplantation stages of development, is random occurrence. We have found the first series of genes underlying the liability of being the mother of DZ twins and have shown that being an MZ twin is strongly associated with a stable DNA methylation signature in child and adult somatic tissues. Because identical twins keep this molecular signature across the lifespan, this discovery opens up completely new possibilities for the retrospective diagnosis of whether a person is an MZ twin whose co-twin may have vanished in the early stages of pregnancy. Here, we summarize the gene finding results for mothers of DZ twins based on genetic association studies followed by meta-analysis, and further present the striking epigenetic results for MZ twins.

Indexed as

Twins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticFemaleFertilizationGenetic Association StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesARTchorionicityearly developmentepigenome-wide association studygenome-wide association studyIVFmultiple pregnancyTwinning Genetics Consortiumvanishing twinzygosity

Identifiers

PMID38052159
PMCPMC10767898

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.