Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055330›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2024

Exploring Maternal and Infant Health App Development and Effectiveness Research: Scoping Review.

J Craig Phillips, Alliete R Alfano, Latisha C Barfield, Lisa Cain, Masoud Sadjadi, Eduardo Morales, Wanda Phillips-Beck, M Grisel Galarza, Maritza Torres, Sadaf Zindani and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

J Craig PhillipsSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-0515
Alliete R AlfanoDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-2640
Latisha C BarfieldNicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7408-5356
Lisa CainChaplin School of Hospitality &Tourism Management, Florida International University, North Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-1549
Masoud SadjadiKnight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-6603
Eduardo MoralesIBM, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9738-4850
Wanda Phillips-BeckFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-612X
M Grisel GalarzaMiller School of Medicine, Pediatrics/Neonatology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-5640
Maritza TorresMiller School of Medicine, Pediatrics/Neonatology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-5097
Sadaf ZindaniSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8069-5487
Ahmad RayaniCollege of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9114-2052
Khalee EdwardsNicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5710-4177
Sande Gracia JonesNicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1763-1445
Jean HannanNicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-620X
Florida International University · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba · CAIBM (United States) · USKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, high rates of maternal and infant mortality call for interventions during the perinatal period to engage pregnant people as well as their loved ones in care. Mobile health technologies have become ubiquitous in our lives and in health care settings. However, there is a need to further explore their safety and effectiveness to support and improve health outcomes locally and globally.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to review and synthesize published literature that described the development process or effectiveness evaluations of maternal and infant apps.

methodsWe applied a methodological framework for scoping reviews as well as the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines; in addition, the systematic review platform Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd) was used to facilitate the review of included studies. Search terms were developed collaboratively, and health sciences-associated databases were searched for studies conducted between January 1, 2000, and February 4, 2022. We excluded studies about apps that only gathered or tracked data or targeted care providers.

resultsA total of 1027 articles were included for title and abstract screening, of which 87 (8.47%) were chosen for full-text screening. Of these 87 articles, 74 (85%) were excluded with reasons, and 19 (22%) were included. Four articles were added at data extraction from hand searching and 2 others were excluded. Thus, we reviewed and synthesized data from 11 unique studies reported in 21 articles published between 2017 and 2021. The included studies represented 8 different countries. Most of the apps (8/11, 73%) were in English, although apps were also developed in Arabic, Bahasa Indonesia, and Nepali. The articles reviewed revealed the early stage of development of the field of maternal and infant health apps, with modest evidence of app use and achievement of study outcomes. Only 1 (9%) of the 11 apps was endorsed by an independent health care provider society. App development and evaluation processes emerged, and specific app features were identified as vital for well-functioning apps. End-user engagement occurred in some, but not all, parts of app research and development.

conclusionsApps to improve maternal and infant health are being developed and launched in enormous numbers, with many of them not developed with mothers' needs in mind. There are concerns about privacy, safety, and the standardization of current apps as well as a need for professional or institution-specific guidelines or best practices. Despite challenges inherent in currently available apps and their design processes, maternal and infant app technology holds promise for achieving health equity goals and improving maternal and child health outcomes. Finally, we propose recommendations for advancing the knowledge base for maternal and infant apps.

Indexed as

AIapp developmentapp effectivenessapp evaluationartificial intelligenceeHealthmaternal and child healthmaternal and infant appmHealthmobile healthmobile phonemotherspregnancy, postpartumsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID38055330
PMCPMC10858421
OpenAlexW4389402125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.