Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055756›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2024

Perceptions of healthcare providers on benefits, risks and barriers regarding intradialytic exercise among haemodialysis patients.

Aurel Zelko, Ivana Skoumalova, Denisa Kravcova, Zuzana Dankulincova Veselska, Jaroslav Rosenberger, Andrea Madarasova Geckova, Jitse P van Dijk, Sijmen A Reijneveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aurel ZelkoDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-9682-2225
Ivana SkoumalovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-4158
Denisa KravcovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
Zuzana Dankulincova VeselskaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-2196
Jaroslav RosenbergerDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-889X
Andrea Madarasova GeckovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2993-3798
Jitse P van DijkGraduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-0225-6811
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1206-7523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinical guidelines call for the inclusion of exercise interventions in every patient's dialysis session, but these recommendations are rarely adopted. Healthcare providers play a key role in this. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how healthcare providers perceive the benefits, risks and barriers of intradialytic exercise (IDE).

methodsWe conducted 21 individual, semi-structured interviews with 11 nurses, 5 nephrologists, 3 training assistants and 2 managers from two dialysis centres in Slovakia. Verbatim transcripts of digitally recorded interviews were thematically analysed using MAXQDA®.

resultsParticipants reported the benefits of IDE as improvements in patients' physical and psychosocial functioning, independence and self-efficacy, clinical profile and quality of therapy. As risks of IDE, they most frequently reported exercise-related damage to vascular access, insufficient individualization of training and musculoskeletal injuries. The presence of psychological problems among patients was reported as a major barrier for initiating and maintaining patients' exercise. Other reported barriers included limitations in financial and personnel resources of haemodialysis care.

conclusionsSafe and sustainable implementation of IDE, which might improve a patient's well-being, need to be prescribed in alignment with the patient's clinical profile, be delivered individually according to the patient's characteristics and requires adjustments in the available resources.

Indexed as

ExerciseRenal DialysisAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansSelf EfficacybarriersbenefitsHaemodialysisimplementationintradialytic exercisequalitative researchrisks

Identifiers

PMID38055756
PMCPMC11737829

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.