Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058099›Full record

ReviewCurrent radiopharmaceuticals2024

Current Advancement and Future Prospects: Biomedical Nanoengineering.

Sonia Singh, Hrishika Sahani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current radiopharmaceuticals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sonia SinghInstitute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, 17 km Stone, NH-2, Mathura-Delhi Road Mathura, Chaumuhan, Uttar Pradesh, 281406, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-2745
Hrishika SahaniLifecell International Pvt. Ltd., NSP Office, Pearls Business Park, 8th Floor Office No-804, Netaji Subhash Palace Delhi, 110034, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in biomedicine have seen a significant reliance on nanoengineering, as traditional methods often fall short in harnessing the unique attributes of biomaterials. Nanoengineering has emerged as a valuable approach to enhance and enrich the performance and functionalities of biomaterials, driving research and development in the field. This review emphasizes the most prevalent biomaterials used in biomedicine, including polymers, nanocomposites, and metallic materials, and explores the pivotal role of nanoengineering in developing biomedical treatments and processes. Particularly, the review highlights research focused on gaining an in-depth understanding of material properties and effectively enhancing material performance through molecular dynamics simulations, all from a nanoengineering perspective.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationNanocompositesNanomedicineNanotechnologyPolymersBiocompatible MaterialsPolymersmetallic materials.Nanocompositesnanoengineeringnanomaterialsnanoparticlespolymers

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.