ArticlePloS one2023
Identification of protein signatures for lung cancer subtypes based on BPSO method.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify protein biomarkers that can distinguish between LUAD and LUSC, critical for personalized treatment plans. The proteomic profiling data of LUAD and LUSC samples from TCPA database, along with phenotype and survival information from TCGA database were downloaded and preprocessed for analysis. We used BPSO feature selection method and identified 10 candidate protein biomarkers that have better classifying performance, as analyzed by t-SNE and PCA algorithms. To explore the causalities among these proteins and their associations with tumor subtypes, we conducted the PCStable algorithm to construct a regulatory network. Results indicated that 4 proteins, MIG6, CD26, NF2, and INPP4B, were directly linked to the lung cancer subtypes and may be useful in guiding therapeutic decision-making. Besides, spearman correlation, Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curve was employed to validate the biological significance of the candidate proteins. In summary, our study highlights the importance of protein biomarkers in the classification of lung cancer subtypes and the potential of computational methods for identifying key biomarkers and understanding their underlying biological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.