ReviewInflammopharmacology2024
Natural agents as wound-healing promoters.
Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wound-Healing Effects of Birch Bark and Propolis Extracts on Epidermolysis Bullosa Keratinocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Innovative microneedle-integrated hydrogels: a promising strategy for diabetic foot ulcer management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Exploring New Horizons in Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Analysis.Recent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2026Review
- Proteomic analysis of altered urinary extracellular vesicle levels in breast cancer patients pre- and post-surgery.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Effects of electrode placement on electrical stimulation for wound healing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In Vivo Wound-Healing and Molecular Docking Studies Support the Traditional Use of Arisarum vulgare Aqueous Extract.Phytotherapy research : PTR · 2025Article
- Exercise-regulated lipolysis: Its role and mechanism in health and diseases.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Article
- CDK1-loaded extracellular vesicles promote cell cycle to reverse impaired wound healing in diabetic obese mice.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- L-PRF in extra-oral wound care.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Review
- From Nature to Healing: Development and Evaluation of Topical Cream Loaded with Pine Tar for Cutaneous Wound Repair.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of acute and chronic wounds resulting from diverse injuries poses a significant challenge to clinical practices and healthcare providers. Wound healing is a complex biological process driven by a natural physiological response. This process involves four distinct phases, namely hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Despite numerous investigations on wound healing and wound dressing materials, complications still persist, necessitating more efficacious therapies. Wound-healing materials can be categorized into natural and synthetic groups. The current study aims to provide a comprehensive review of highly active natural animal and herbal agents as wound-healing promoters. To this end, we present an overview of in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies that led to the discovery of potential therapeutic agents for wound healing. We further elucidated the effects of natural materials on various pharmacological pathways of wound healing. The results of previous investigations suggest that natural agents hold great promise as viable and accessible products for the treatment of diverse wound types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.