Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062359›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2023

Reverse shock index (RSI) as a predictor of post-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA).

Mehdi Torabi, Ghazal Soleimani Mahani, Moghaddameh Mirzaee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehdi TorabiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. mtorabi1390@yahoo.com.
Ghazal Soleimani MahaniFaculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Moghaddameh MirzaeeBiostatistics, Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndotracheal intubation (ETI) in critically ill patients is a high-risk procedure due to the increased risk of cardiac arrest, and several factors may predict poor outcomes in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of some factors, especially newly introduced vital signs such as the reverse shock index (RSI), in predicting post-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA) in critically ill adult patients.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on critically ill patients over 18 years of age who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) and underwent ETI within 1 year. Patients who developed PICA and those without this event were included in the study, and their features were compared. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest.

resultsOf 394 patients, 127 patients were included, of whom 95 (74.8%) developed PICA, and 32 (25.2%) did not experience cardiac arrest after intubation. In multivariate analysis, age, RSI, oxygen saturation, and total bilirubin were significantly associated with PICA. In addition, patients with RSI < 1 had a significantly higher risk of developing PICA (odds ratio = 5.22, 95% CI 1.83-14.86, p = 0.002). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for predicting PICA were 51.11%, 83.33%, 90.2%, 36.23%, and 59.17%, respectively. The ROC curve for RSI showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66.

conclusionRSI may be useful in predicting PICA with higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the shock index. Furthermore, advanced age, hypoxia, and hyperbilirubinemia may increase the risk of PICA in patients admitted to the ED.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestEmergency departmentIntubationVital signs

Identifiers

PMID38062359
PMCPMC10702001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.