Evidence mapPaperPMID 38063993Full record

ArticleThe patient2024

A Best-Worst Scaling Study of the General Population's Preferences for Activities in Living Arrangements for Persons With Dementia.

Christian Speckemeier, Carina Abels, Klemens Höfer, Anke Walendzik, Jürgen Wasem, Silke Neusser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian SpeckemeierInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany. christian.speckemeier@medman.uni-due.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7507-4432
Carina AbelsInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-2944
Klemens HöferInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.
Anke WalendzikInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-7525
Jürgen WasemInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-168X
Silke NeusserInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9077-7005
University of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActivity involvement is a central element of dementia care. However, few studies have examined preferences for types of activities for persons who may be in need of care in the future. In this study, a best-worst scaling (BWS) was conducted to gather insights on preferred activities in small-scale living arrangements for dementia in the general population aged 50-65 years from rural and urban regions.

methodsBWS tasks were developed based on literature searches and focus groups. The final BWS contains ten activities, namely 'interaction with animals', 'gardening', 'painting, handicrafts, manual activities', 'household activities (e.g., folding laundry, cooking)', 'watching television', 'practicing religion', 'listening to music and singing familiar songs', 'conversations about the past', 'walks and excursions', 'sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)'. Each participant had to fill out subsets of four objects each and identify them as best and worst. A postal survey was sent to a total of 4390 persons from rural and urban regions aged between 50 and 65 years. Results were analyzed by count analysis and logit models. It was examined if preferences differ with respect to gender, religiousness, and informal caregiving experience.

resultsA total of 840 questionnaires were returned, and 627 surveys were included in the analysis. In the rural sample, the highest relative importance (RI) was assigned to 'walks and excursions' (RI: 100%), 'sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)' (RI: 56%), 'gardening' (RI: 28%), and 'interaction with animals' (26%). In the urban sample, 'walks and excursions' (RI: 100%), 'sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)' (RI: 37%), 'interaction with animals' (25%) and 'gardening' (RI: 22%) were perceived as most important. In both groups, household activities and practicing religion were of lowest importance. Importance ranks differed between subgroups. Results of the logit models with random effects showed the same order as results from the count analyses. DISCUSSION: Our findings show that respondents generally favored activities with an outdoor component, while the household activities that are part of many concepts were of low importance to respondents. Thus, our study can inform the design of a preference-based specific range of activities in small-scale living arrangements for dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38063993
PMCPMC10894109
OpenAlexW4389489250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.