Evidence mapPaperPMID 38064014Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

Selection of clinically relevant drug concentrations for in vitro studies of candidates drugs for cancer repurposing: a proposal.

Benjamin Robles-Bañuelos, Adriana Romo-Perez, Guadalupe Dominguez-Gomez, Alma Chavez-Blanco, Aurora Gonzalez-Fierro, Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin Robles-Bañuelos *Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Adriana Romo-Perez *Instituto de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Guadalupe Dominguez-GomezSubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alma Chavez-BlancoSubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Aurora Gonzalez-FierroSubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alfonso Duenas-GonzalezInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico. alfonso_duenasg@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2956-645X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repurposing of widely prescribed patent-off and cheap drugs may provide affordable drugs for cancer treatment. Nevertheless, many preclinical studies of cancer drug repurposing candidates use in vitro drug concentrations too high to have clinical relevance. Hence, preclinical studies must use clinically achievable drug concentrations. In this work, several FDA-approved cancer drugs are analyzed regarding the correlation between the drug inhibitory concentrations 50% (IC

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsDrug RepositioningHumansAntineoplastic AgentsAUCCancerC maxDrug repurposingPharmacodynamicsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.