ArticleJAMA health forum2023
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use Among Medicaid-Only and Dual-Eligible Decedents.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sociodemographic disparities and hospice referral practice patterns among patients with recurrent cervical cancer.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Trends in preferred place of death among patients with bladder cancer in the United States, 2000 to 2020.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Surgery: Investigating Racial Disparities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- State-Level Variability in Location of Death of Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- A Multidimensional Narrative Review of Disparities in Hospice Care Use.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026Article
- Place of death among adults with interstitial lung disease in the United States, 1999-2023: a national population-based study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Trends and disparities in place of death among patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A two-decade analysis.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Post-Acute Transition to Home With Supportive Care (PATHS): A Novel Nurse Practitioner-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve End-of-Life Oncology Care.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Article
- Article
- Evolution in Documented Goals of Care at End of Life for Adolescents and Younger Adults With Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Errors in Table 2 and Table 4.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Errors in the Abstract Results and Table.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Hospice care enhances quality of life for people with terminal illness and is most beneficial with longer length of stay (LOS). Most hospice research focuses on the Medicare-insured population. Little is known about hospice use for the racially and ethnically diverse, low-income Medicaid population. Objective: To compare hospice use and hospice LOS by race and ethnicity among Medicaid-only individuals and those with dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid (duals) in the Connecticut Medicaid program who died over a 4-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study used Medicaid and traditional Medicare enrollment and claims data for 2015 to 2020. The study included Connecticut Medicaid recipients with at least 1 of 5 most common hospice diagnoses who died from 2017 to 2020. Exposure: Race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospice use (yes/no) and hospice LOS (1-7 days vs ≥8 days.) Covariates included sex, age, and nursing facility stay within 60 days of death. Results: Overall, 2407 and 23 857 duals were included. Medicaid-only decedents were younger (13.8% ≥85 vs 52.5%), more likely to be male (50.6% vs 36.4%), more racially and ethnically diverse (48.7% non-Hispanic White vs 79.9%), and less likely to have a nursing facility stay (34.9% vs 56.1%). Race and ethnicity were significantly associated with hospice use and LOS in both populations: non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic decedents had lower odds of using hospice than non-Hispanic White decedents, and Hispanic decedents had higher odds of a short LOS. In both populations, older age and female sex were also associated with more hospice use. For duals only, higher age was associated with lower odds of short LOS. For decedents with nursing facility stays, compared with those without, Medicaid-only decedents had higher odds of using hospice (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.24-1.78); duals had lower odds (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.63). Compared with decedents without nursing facility stays, duals with a nursing facility stay had higher odds of short LOS (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.43-2.85). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings raise concerns about equity and timing of access to hospice for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black individuals in these understudied Medicaid populations. Knowledge about, access to, and acceptance of hospice may be lacking for these low-income individuals. Further research is needed to understand barriers to and facilitators of hospice use for people with nursing facility stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.