Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38064239›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2023

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use Among Medicaid-Only and Dual-Eligible Decedents.

Julie Robison, Noreen Shugrue, Ellis Dillon, Deborah Migneault, Doreek Charles, Dorothy Wakefield, Bradley Richards

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Surgery: Investigating Racial Disparities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Multidimensional Narrative Review of Disparities in Hospice Care Use.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Errors in Table 2 and Table 4.JAMA health forum · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie RobisonUConn Health, Center on Aging, Farmington, Connecticut.
Noreen ShugrueUConn Health, Center on Aging, Farmington, Connecticut.
Ellis DillonUConn Health, Center on Aging, Farmington, Connecticut.
Deborah MigneaultUConn Health, Center on Aging, Farmington, Connecticut.
Doreek CharlesUConn Health, Center on Aging, Farmington, Connecticut.
Dorothy WakefieldUConn Health, Center on Aging, Farmington, Connecticut.
Bradley RichardsConnecticut Department of Social Services, Hartford, Connecticut.
UConn Health · USConnecticut Department of Social Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hospice care enhances quality of life for people with terminal illness and is most beneficial with longer length of stay (LOS). Most hospice research focuses on the Medicare-insured population. Little is known about hospice use for the racially and ethnically diverse, low-income Medicaid population. Objective: To compare hospice use and hospice LOS by race and ethnicity among Medicaid-only individuals and those with dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid (duals) in the Connecticut Medicaid program who died over a 4-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study used Medicaid and traditional Medicare enrollment and claims data for 2015 to 2020. The study included Connecticut Medicaid recipients with at least 1 of 5 most common hospice diagnoses who died from 2017 to 2020. Exposure: Race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospice use (yes/no) and hospice LOS (1-7 days vs ≥8 days.) Covariates included sex, age, and nursing facility stay within 60 days of death. Results: Overall, 2407 and 23 857 duals were included. Medicaid-only decedents were younger (13.8% ≥85 vs 52.5%), more likely to be male (50.6% vs 36.4%), more racially and ethnically diverse (48.7% non-Hispanic White vs 79.9%), and less likely to have a nursing facility stay (34.9% vs 56.1%). Race and ethnicity were significantly associated with hospice use and LOS in both populations: non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic decedents had lower odds of using hospice than non-Hispanic White decedents, and Hispanic decedents had higher odds of a short LOS. In both populations, older age and female sex were also associated with more hospice use. For duals only, higher age was associated with lower odds of short LOS. For decedents with nursing facility stays, compared with those without, Medicaid-only decedents had higher odds of using hospice (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.24-1.78); duals had lower odds (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.63). Compared with decedents without nursing facility stays, duals with a nursing facility stay had higher odds of short LOS (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.43-2.85). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings raise concerns about equity and timing of access to hospice for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black individuals in these understudied Medicaid populations. Knowledge about, access to, and acceptance of hospice may be lacking for these low-income individuals. Further research is needed to understand barriers to and facilitators of hospice use for people with nursing facility stays.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38064239
PMCPMC10709774
OpenAlexW4389490472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.