ArticlePloS one2023
A comparative analysis of converters of tabular data into image for the classification of Arboviruses using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic phase of Chikungunya: understanding the impact of joint pain using data science and artificial intelligence.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Transforming tabular data into images via enhanced spatial relationships for CNN processing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Methodology for the Differential Classification of Dengue and Chikungunya According to the PAHO 2022 Diagnostic Guide.Viruses · 2024Article
- Enhanced analysis of tabular data through Multi-representation DeepInsight.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tabular data is commonly used in business and literature and can be analyzed using tree-based Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to extract meaningful information. Deep Learning (DL) excels in data such as image, sound, and text, but it is less frequently utilized with tabular data. However, it is possible to use tools to convert tabular data into images for use with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) which are powerful DL models for image classification. The goal of this work is to compare the performance of converters for tabular data into images, select the best one, optimize a CNN using random search, and compare it with an optimized ML algorithm, the XGBoost. Results show that even a basic CNN, with only 1 convolutional layer, can reach comparable metrics to the XGBoost, which was trained on the original tabular data and optimized with grid search and feature selection. However, further optimization of the CNN with random search did not significantly improve its performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.