Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38065686›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of occupational therapy2024

Occupational therapy and cooking: A scoping review and future directions.

R Hingst, D C Alvarado, L Bardin, N Farmer

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R HingstRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
D C AlvaradoRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
L BardinRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
N FarmerTranslational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USOffice of the Director · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational therapy (OT) has historically used cooking as an intervention and assessment approach across settings. Current practices in OT and the emergence of the multidisciplinary field of culinary medicine highlight the relationship between cooking and health. AIMS/

objectivesTo map the current literature on OT and cooking and to identify key factors that may facilitate collaboration within culinary medicine. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to identify primary contexts and clinical settings. Publications were analysed using framework thematic analysis to identify OT themes and roles.

resultsA total of 56 studies met the criteria for inclusion. The majority of studies ( CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: OT's holistic practice places cooking within a larger context that can help identify and overcome the barriers to participation. Findings support multiple pathways in which OT can contribute to cooking initiatives for health promotion and potentially expand OT practice in population health.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyCookingHealth PromotionHumansOccupationsCulinary medicinefood skillshealth promotionmeal preparationmultidisciplinarypopulation healthsecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID38065686
PMCPMC11635739
OpenAlexW4389498157

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.