ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2024
Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post-procedural mortality: a model development and validation study.
Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline for the Comprehensive Perioperative Management of Older Patients With Lung Cancer (2025).Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Guideline
- Machine learning for endoscopic third ventriculostomy success prediction-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Pooled it
- Multi-task artificial intelligence annotation of echocardiographic images: a retrospective multi-cohort study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Sources of Variation in Cardiovascular Care Cascades.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Structural error asymmetry and harm-weighted analysis of ChatGPT versus ICU Physicians in acid-base interpretation: a prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Artificial intelligence-based prediction of fetal hypoxia: a multicenter model development and nationwide AI-human comparison.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced ECG score for perioperative risk assessment in non-cardiac surgery.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography in Practice: A State-of-the-Art Review.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Development and explanation of electrocardiogram-based deep learning for predicting short-term mortality in heart failure patients.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Digitizing paper ECGs at scale: an open-source algorithm for clinical research.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography for Preoperatively Detecting Atrial Fibrillation and Mortality Risk in Patients with Sinus Rhythm.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond static risk scores: dynamic world models simulating patient-specific trajectories to inform preoperative risk mitigation strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Preoperative risk prediction of major cardiovascular events in noncardiac surgery using the 12-lead electrocardiogram: an explainable deep learning approach.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Observational
- Artificial Intelligence in Ambulatory Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of medical systems · 2025Review
- External validation of PreOpNet to predict 30-day mortality after major non-cardiac surgery using digital electrocardiogram.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- ProtoECGNet: Case-Based Interpretable Deep Learning for Multi-Label ECG Classification with Contrastive Learning.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
- A deep learning phenome wide association study of the electrocardiogram.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- CLLAF SCORE-A New Risk Score for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation in Treatment-Naive CLL Patients Initiating First- and Second-Generation BTK Inhibitor Therapy.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Novel accurate classification system developed using order transition pattern feature engineering technique with physiological signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative risk assessments used in clinical practice are insufficient in their ability to identify risk for postoperative mortality. Deep-learning analysis of electrocardiography can identify hidden risk markers that can help to prognosticate postoperative mortality. We aimed to develop a prognostic model that accurately predicts postoperative mortality in patients undergoing medical procedures and who had received preoperative electrocardiographic diagnostic testing.
methodsIn a derivation cohort of preoperative patients with available electrocardiograms (ECGs) from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA, USA) between Jan 1, 2015 and Dec 31, 2019, a deep-learning algorithm was developed to leverage waveform signals to discriminate postoperative mortality. We randomly split patients (8:1:1) into subsets for training, internal validation, and final algorithm test analyses. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in the hold-out test dataset and in two external hospital cohorts and compared with the established Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score. The primary outcome was post-procedural mortality across three health-care systems.
findings45 969 patients had a complete ECG waveform image available for at least one 12-lead ECG performed within the 30 days before the procedure date (59 975 inpatient procedures and 112 794 ECGs): 36 839 patients in the training dataset, 4549 in the internal validation dataset, and 4581 in the internal test dataset. In the held-out internal test cohort, the algorithm discriminates mortality with an AUC value of 0·83 (95% CI 0·79-0·87), surpassing the discrimination of the RCRI score with an AUC of 0·67 (0·61-0·72). The algorithm similarly discriminated risk for mortality in two independent US health-care systems, with AUCs of 0·79 (0·75-0·83) and 0·75 (0·74-0·76), respectively. Patients determined to be high risk by the deep-learning model had an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 8·83 (5·57-13·20) for postoperative mortality compared with an unadjusted OR of 2·08 (0·77-3·50) for postoperative mortality for RCRI scores of more than 2. The deep-learning algorithm performed similarly for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (AUC 0·85 [0·77-0·92]), non-cardiac surgery (AUC 0·83 [0·79-0·88]), and catheterisation or endoscopy suite procedures (AUC 0·76 [0·72-0·81]).
interpretationA deep-learning algorithm interpreting preoperative ECGs can improve discrimination of postoperative mortality. The deep-learning algorithm worked equally well for risk stratification of cardiac surgeries, non-cardiac surgeries, and catheterisation laboratory procedures, and was validated in three independent health-care systems. This algorithm can provide additional information to clinicians making the decision to perform medical procedures and stratify the risk of future complications.
fundingNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.