ArticleScientific reports2023
Pericentromeric recombination suppression and the 'large X effect' in plants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- ProSeq4: A user-friendly multiplatform program for preparation and analysis of large-scale DNA polymorphism datasets.Molecular ecology resources · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
X chromosome was reported to be a major contributor to isolation between closely related species-the 'large X' effect (LXE). The causes of LXE are not clear, but the leading theory is that it is caused by recessive species incompatibilities exposed in the phenotype due to the hemizygosity of X-linked genes in the heterogametic sex. However, the LXE was also reported in species with relatively recently evolved sex chromosomes where Y chromosome is not completely degenerate and X-linked genes are not hemizygous, such as the plant Silene latifolia. Recent genome sequencing and detailed genetic mapping in this species revealed a massive (> 330 Mb) non- or rarely-recombining pericentromeric region on the X chromosome (Xpr) that comprises ~ 90% of the chromosome and over 13% of the entire genome. If any of the Xpr genes are involved in species incompatibilities, this would oppose interspecific gene flow for other genes tightly linked in the Xpr. Here we test the hypothesis that the previously reported LXE in S. latifolia is caused by the lack of recombination on most of the X chromosome. Based on genome-wide analysis of DNA polymorphism and gene expression in S. latifolia and its close cross-compatible relative S. dioica, we report that the rarely-recombining regions represent a significant barrier for interspecific gene flow. We found little evidence for any additional factors contributing to the LXE, suggesting that extensive pericentromeric recombination suppression on the X-chromosome is the major if not the only cause of the LXE in S. latifolia and S. dioica.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.