ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Application of Technology in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, a Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurological outcome predictors after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical application of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Video Review of Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Review
- Clinical Utility of a Feedback Device in High-Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Guardian Angel.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring enablers and barriers to the use of chest compression feedback devices in advanced life support: a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Less-Invasive Hemodynamic and Tissue Perfusion Monitoring in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Current and emerging innovations in technology, strategy, and artificial intelligence: a new era in cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Reliability of Manual Pulse Checks Versus Emerging Techniques in Pediatric Resuscitation: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Assessment of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) response times and operational factors in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA): a retrospective analysis.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Chain of Survival: The Role of Smartphone Applications in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel medical technologies are designed to aid in cardiopulmonary resuscitation both in and out of the hospital. Out-of-hospital innovations utilize the skills of paramedics, bystanders, and other prehospital personnel, while in-hospital innovations traditionally aid in physician intervention. Our review of current literature aims to describe the benefits and limitations of six main technologic advancements with wide adoption for their practicality and functionality. The six key technologies include: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), real-time feedback devices, smart devices, video review, point-of-care ultrasound, and unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) automated external defibrillator (AED) delivery. The benefits and limitations of each technology were independently reviewed and expounded upon. Newer technologies like drone AED delivery, paramedic ultrasound use, and smart devices have been demonstrated to be safe and feasible, however, further studies are needed to compellingly demonstrate improved patient outcomes. In-hospital use of ECMO and ultrasound is well established by current literature to aid in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.