ArticleJournal of inflammation research2023
Cartilage Endplate-Derived Stem Cells for Regeneration of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: An Analytic Study.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of a novel 3-gene diagnostic signature related to senescence in intervertebral disc degeneration.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is considered the predominant cause of low back pain (LBP) and accounts for global disability and a substantial socioeconomic burden. Given the unsatisfactory outcomes of current treatment strategies, cartilage endplate-derived stem cells (CESCs) are increasingly used in intervertebral disc regeneration. However, comprehensive analyses on CESCs remain rare. Herein, we examined the biological functions and applications of CESCs in IDD. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies focused on CESCs. Relevant information from included studies was extracted. Descriptive statistics were performed. Correlation analysis was conducted to determine the relationship among Web of Science (WoS) citations, Dimensions, and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). Results: Twenty-six studies were included in this study. Most studies (n=20) isolated CESCs from humans, followed by rats (n=5) and rabbits (n=1). Twenty studies were performed in vitro, and the remaining six were implemented both in vivo and in vitro. The findings of this study provide insight into the biological properties of CESCs and clarify their potential application for intervertebral disc regeneration. There was a very high correlation between WoS and Dimensions citation count (p<0.001, r=0.988). Conclusion: This study, for the first time, elaborates biological features of CESCs and analyzes their potential applications in regenerating intervertebral discs. CESCs may be promising candidates for protecting the intervertebral disc from degeneration and contributing to intervertebral disc regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.