Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087278›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2023

Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells associated with white blood cells in solid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1471 patients with solid tumors.

Mingguang Ju, Ziming Gao, Gaoxiang Gu, Haibo Huang, Anqi Sun, Chen Zheng, He Li, Yixiao Zhang, Kai Li

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingguang Ju *Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
Ziming Gao *Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
Gaoxiang Gu *Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
Haibo HuangVIP International Department, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
Anqi SunVIP International Department, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
Chen ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
He LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
Yixiao ZhangDepartment of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
Kai LiDepartment of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, Heping District, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Shenyang City, 110001, China. cmu_likai@163.com.
China Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2020M681021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical relevance of circulating tumor cell-white blood cell (CTC-WBC) clusters in cancer prognosis is a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to unravel their contentious predictive value for patient outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2022. Eligible studies that reported survival outcomes and examined the presence of CTC-WBC clusters in solid tumor patients were included. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled to assess the association between CTC-WBC clusters and overall survival (OS), as well as progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS)/metastasis-free survival (MFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on sampling time, treatment method, detection method, detection system, and cancer type.

resultsA total of 1471 patients from 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The presence of CTC-WBCs was assessed as a prognostic factor for overall survival and PFS/DFS/MFS/RFS. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the presence of CTC-WBC clusters was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.74-3.40, P < 0.001) and PFS/DFS/MFS/RFS (HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.49-2.24, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses based on sampling time, treatment method, detection method, detection system, cancer type, and study type consistently supported these findings. Further analyses indicated that CTC-WBC clusters were associated with larger tumor size (OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.58-4.44, P < 0.001) and higher alpha-fetoprotein levels (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.50-4.22, P < 0.001) in hepatocellular carcinoma. However, no significant association was found between CTC-WBC clusters and TNM stage, depth of tumor invasion, or lymph node metastasis in the overall analysis.

conclusionsCTC-WBC clusters are negative predictors for OS and PFS/DFS/MFS/RFS in patients with solid tumors. Monitoring CTC-WBC levels may provide valuable information for predicting disease progression and guiding treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingDisease-Free SurvivalHumansPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalCirculating tumor cellCirculating tumor cell-associated white blood cellsMetastasisPrognosisSolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID38087278
PMCPMC10717563
OpenAlexW4389615847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.