Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089777›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Role of vascular smooth muscle cell clonality in atherosclerosis.

Lingfeng Luo, Changhao Fu, Caitlin F Bell, Ying Wang, Nicholas J Leeper

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Vascular smooth muscle cell plasticity in the tumor microenvironment.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Efferocytosis in atherosclerosis.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lingfeng LuoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Changhao FuDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Caitlin F BellDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Ying WangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nicholas J LeeperDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Clonal expansion, resistance to efferocytosis and innate immunity in atherosclerosisR35HL144475 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEEPER, NICHOLAS JAMES · 2019 to 2024
$5.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL144475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. While many cell types contribute to the growing atherosclerotic plaque, the vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) is a major contributor due in part to its remarkable plasticity and ability to undergo phenotype switching in response to injury. SMCs can migrate into the fibrous cap, presumably stabilizing the plaque, or accumulate within the lesional core, possibly accelerating vascular inflammation. How SMCs expand and react to disease stimuli has been a controversial topic for many decades. While early studies relying on X-chromosome inactivation were inconclusive due to low resolution and sensitivity, recent advances in multi-color lineage tracing models have revitalized the concept that SMCs likely expand in an oligoclonal fashion during atherogenesis. Current efforts are focused on determining whether all SMCs have equal capacity for clonal expansion or if a "stem-like" progenitor cell may exist, and to understand how constituents of the clone decide which phenotype they will ultimately adopt as the disease progresses. Mechanistic studies are also beginning to dissect the processes which confer cells with their overall survival advantage, test whether these properties are attributable to intrinsic features of the expanding clone, and define the role of cross-talk between proliferating SMCs and other plaque constituents such as neighboring macrophages. In this review, we aim to summarize the historical perspectives on SMC clonality, highlight unanswered questions, and identify translational issues which may need to be considered as therapeutics directed against SMC clonality are developed as a novel approach to targeting atherosclerosis.

Indexed as

atherosclerosiscardiovascular diseaseclonalityphenotype plasticityvascular smooth muscle cell

Identifiers

PMID38089777
PMCPMC10713728
OpenAlexW4389092954

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.