Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089903›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2023

Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries.

Chelsea Modlin, Jeremy Sugarman, Gershom Chongwe, Nancy Kass, Winfred Nazziwa, Jemee Tegli, Prakriti Shrestha, Joseph Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Understanding Heterogeneity in Acute Care Trials: Resource Availability Impacts Outcomes.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chelsea ModlinBerman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-9812
Jeremy SugarmanBerman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-8332
Gershom ChongweSchool of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nancy KassBerman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Winfred NazziwaUganda National Council for Science and Technology, Kampala, Uganda.
Jemee TegliFamily Health International Clinical/Partnership for Research on Vaccines and Infectious Diseases in Liberia, Monrovia, Liberia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-032X
Prakriti ShresthaDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.
Joseph AliBerman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4767-2512
Johns Hopkins University · USUganda National Council for Higher Education · UGUniversity of Liberia · LRUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Use of adaptive clinical trials, particularly adaptive platform trials, has grown exponentially in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Implementation of these trials in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been fostered through the formation or modification of transnational research partnerships, typically between research groups from LMICs and high-income countries (HICs). While these partnerships are important to promote collaboration and overcome the structural and economic disadvantages faced by LMIC health researchers, it is critical to focus attention on the multiple dimensions of partnership equity. Methods: Based on informal literature reviews and a meeting with leaders of one of the multinational COVID-19 adaptive platform trials, we describe some important considerations about research partnership equity in this context. Results: We organize these considerations into eight thematic categories: 1) epistemic structures, 2) funding, 3) ethics oversight, 4) regulatory oversight, 5) leadership, 6) post-trial access to interventions, data, and specimens, 7) knowledge translation and dissemination, and 8) research capacity strengthening and maintenance. Within each category we review normative claims that support its relevance to research partnership equity followed by discussion of how adaptive platform trials highlight new dimensions, considerations, or challenges. Conclusion: In aggregate, these observations provide insight into procedural and substantive equity-building measures within transnational global health research partnerships more broadly.

Indexed as

international research partnership; equity; adaptive platform trials; adaptive clinical trials; public health emergencies

Identifiers

PMID38089903
PMCPMC10714106
OpenAlexW4389390483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.