ArticleWellcome open research2023
Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dissemination of trial results to study participants in Cambodia, Ethiopia and Pakistan: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Trial
- Global inequities in the adoption of innovative clinical trial designs: a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.BMJ open · 2026Observational
- Review
- Globalization of Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Current characteristics and future goals.International psychogeriatrics · 2025Review
- Transforming partnerships through transboundary research.BMJ global health · 2025Review
- Drug-resistant tuberculosis treatments, the case for a phase III platform trial.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Article
- Understanding Heterogeneity in Acute Care Trials: Resource Availability Impacts Outcomes.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Mentorship as an overlooked dimension of research capacity strengthening: how to embed value-driven practices in global health.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Challenges of biomedical research collaboration in India: Perceptions of Indian and international researchers.PloS one · 2024Article
- The critical need to accelerate cerebral palsy research with consumer engagement, global networks, and adaptive designs.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Ethical priorities for international collaborative adaptive platform trials for public health emergencies.BMJ global health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Use of adaptive clinical trials, particularly adaptive platform trials, has grown exponentially in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Implementation of these trials in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been fostered through the formation or modification of transnational research partnerships, typically between research groups from LMICs and high-income countries (HICs). While these partnerships are important to promote collaboration and overcome the structural and economic disadvantages faced by LMIC health researchers, it is critical to focus attention on the multiple dimensions of partnership equity. Methods: Based on informal literature reviews and a meeting with leaders of one of the multinational COVID-19 adaptive platform trials, we describe some important considerations about research partnership equity in this context. Results: We organize these considerations into eight thematic categories: 1) epistemic structures, 2) funding, 3) ethics oversight, 4) regulatory oversight, 5) leadership, 6) post-trial access to interventions, data, and specimens, 7) knowledge translation and dissemination, and 8) research capacity strengthening and maintenance. Within each category we review normative claims that support its relevance to research partnership equity followed by discussion of how adaptive platform trials highlight new dimensions, considerations, or challenges. Conclusion: In aggregate, these observations provide insight into procedural and substantive equity-building measures within transnational global health research partnerships more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.