ReviewHeliyon2023
Advancing biological investigations using portable sensors for detection of sensitive samples.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive biomarkers for early oral cancer detection through multiomics approach.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Carbon Dot-Based Electrochemical and Optical Sensors for Pharmaceutical Analysis and Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Bioelectronics forNanotheranostics · 2026Review
- Advancements in Electrochemical Biosensors for Comprehensive Glycosylation Assessment of Biotherapeutics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biosensor Technologies for Water Quality: Detection of Emerging Contaminants and Pathogens.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Heavy Metal-Gut Microbiota Interactions: Probiotics Modulation and Biosensors Detection.Biosensors · 2025Review
- 3D printed miniature attenuated total internal reflection assisted fluorescence microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rapid and sensitive detection ofHeliyon · 2025Article
- Environmental resilience through artificial intelligence: innovations in monitoring and management.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Review
- Sensors in the Detection of Abused Substances in Forensic Contexts: A Comprehensive Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Portable biosensors are emerged as powerful diagnostic tools for analyzing intricately complex biological samples. These biosensors offer sensitive detection capabilities by utilizing biomolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, microbes or microbial products, antibodies, and enzymes. Their speed, accuracy, stability, specificity, and low cost make them indispensable in forensic investigations and criminal cases. Notably, portable biosensors have been developed to rapidly detect toxins, poisons, body fluids, and explosives; they have proven invaluable in forensic examinations of suspected samples, generating efficient results that enable effective and fair trials. One of the key advantages of portable biosensors is their ability to provide sensitive and non-destructive detection of forensic samples without requiring extensive sample preparation, thereby reducing the possibility of false results. This comprehensive review provides an overview of the current advancements in portable biosensors for the detection of sensitive materials, highlighting their significance in advancing investigations and enhancing sensitive sample detection capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.