Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091508›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

MLcps: machine learning cumulative performance score for classification problems.

Akshay Akshay, Masoud Abedi, Navid Shekarchizadeh, Fiona C Burkhard, Mitali Katoch, Alex Bigger-Allen, Rosalyn M Adam, Katia Monastyrskaya, Ali Hashemi Gheinani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Akshay AkshayFunctional Urology Research Group, Department for BioMedical Research DBMR, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-7478
Masoud AbediDepartment of Medical Data Science, Leipzig University Medical Centre, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3986-4028
Navid ShekarchizadehDepartment of Medical Data Science, Leipzig University Medical Centre, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5750-7801
Fiona C BurkhardFunctional Urology Research Group, Department for BioMedical Research DBMR, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-014X
Mitali KatochInstitute of Neuropathology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9248-6348
Alex Bigger-AllenBiological & Biomedical Sciences Program, Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, 02115 Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-9135
Rosalyn M AdamUrological Diseases Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, 02115 Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-6236
Katia MonastyrskayaFunctional Urology Research Group, Department for BioMedical Research DBMR, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2042-1139
Ali Hashemi GheinaniFunctional Urology Research Group, Department for BioMedical Research DBMR, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-6259

Funding

MECHANOTRANSDUCTION IN BLADDER SMOOTH MUSCLER01DK077195 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ADAM, ROSALYN M · 2008 to 2018
$3.4M
NIMBLE: Non-Invasive Markers of Bladder DeteriorationR01DK127673 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ADAM, ROSALYN M, LEE, RICHARD SANG-YONG · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
National Science Foundation 310030NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK077195NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK127673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing the performance of machine learning (ML) models requires careful consideration of the evaluation metrics used. It is often necessary to utilize multiple metrics to gain a comprehensive understanding of a trained model's performance, as each metric focuses on a specific aspect. However, comparing the scores of these individual metrics for each model to determine the best-performing model can be time-consuming and susceptible to subjective user preferences, potentially introducing bias.

resultsWe propose the Machine Learning Cumulative Performance Score (MLcps), a novel evaluation metric for classification problems. MLcps integrates several precomputed evaluation metrics into a unified score, enabling a comprehensive assessment of the trained model's strengths and weaknesses. We tested MLcps on 4 publicly available datasets, and the results demonstrate that MLcps provides a holistic evaluation of the model's robustness, ensuring a thorough understanding of its overall performance.

conclusionsBy utilizing MLcps, researchers and practitioners no longer need to individually examine and compare multiple metrics to identify the best-performing models. Instead, they can rely on a single MLcps value to assess the overall performance of their ML models. This streamlined evaluation process saves valuable time and effort, enhancing the efficiency of model evaluation. MLcps is available as a Python package at https://pypi.org/project/MLcps/.

Indexed as

Machine Learningclassification problemsmachine learningmodel evaluationPython packageunified evaluation score

Identifiers

PMID38091508
PMCPMC10716825

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.