Evidence mapPaperPMID 38093031Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2024

Efficacy of Osteoporosis Medications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Tatiane Vilaca, Richard Eastell

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of Anabolic Anti-Osteoporosis Therapy in Diabetes Subjects.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiane VilacaMellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. t.vilaca@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-6076
Richard EastellMellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Northern General Hospital · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThe purpose of the review is to summarise the current scientific evidence on the efficacy of osteoporosis medications in patients with type 2 diabetes. RECENT

findingsType 2 diabetes (T2D) is a growing global epidemic. The highest prevalence is observed in the elderly, the same population affected by osteoporosis. Despite normal or even increased bone mineral density and low bone turnover, T2D is associated with an increased risk of fractures in most skeletal sites. These findings raised concerns over the efficacy of anti-osteoporosis drugs in this population. There is no randomised controlled trial designed specifically for people with T2D. However, observational studies and post-hoc analyses of randomised controlled trials have provided valuable insights into the effects of various anti-osteoporosis treatments in this population. Overall, most anti-osteoporosis drugs seem to have similar efficacy and safety profiles for people with and without type 2 diabetes. However, continued research and long-term safety data are needed to optimise treatment strategies and improve bone health outcomes in this population. The current evidence suggests that most anti-osteoporosis drugs exhibit comparable efficacy in people with and without T2D.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Fractures, BoneOsteoporosisAgedBone and BonesBone DensityHumansBone Density Conservation AgentsAnti-osteoporosis treatmentFracturesOsteoporosisType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38093031
PMCPMC10912145
OpenAlexW4389703369

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.