ReviewJACC. Asia2023
Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.
Review in JACC. Asia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in post-PCI target vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and associated outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- A proposal of an echocardiography-based pathway for the diagnosis and management of angina with no obstructive coronary arteries: a state-of-the-art review: Advancing Targeted Therapy and Prognosis Through Endotype Identification.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- Symptom phenotypes and coronary microvascular function in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Insights beyond epicardial ischemia.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Water Hammer Phenomenon in Coronary Arteries: Scientific Basis for Diagnostic and Predictive Modeling with Acoustic Action Mapping.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Angiography-derived physiological patterns of coronary artery disease: implications with post-stenting physiology and long-term clinical outcomes.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Article
- Contrasting the relationship of serum uric acid/albumin ratio on quantitative flow ratio with other multiple composite parameters in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Coronary Physiology Assessment: On Becoming Faster, Friendlier, and a Better Guiding Companion.JACC. Asia · 2023Article
- Coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory: current practices, historical insights, and future directions.Cardiology plusReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
33 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary physiologic assessment is performed to measure coronary pressure, flow, and resistance or their surrogates to enable the selection of appropriate management strategy and its optimization for patients with coronary artery disease. The value of physiologic assessment is supported by a large body of evidence that has led to major recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. This expert consensus document aims to convey practical and balanced recommendations and future perspectives for coronary physiologic assessment for physicians and patients in the Asia-Pacific region based on updated information in the field that including both wire- and image-based physiologic assessment. This is Part 1 of the whole consensus document, which describes the general concept of coronary physiology, as well as practical information on the clinical application of physiologic indices and novel image-based physiologic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.