Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38097992›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2023

Resorbable magnesium metal membrane for sinus lift procedures: a case series.

Akiva Elad, Luka Pul, Patrick Rider, Svenja Rogge, Frank Witte, Dražen Tadić, Eitan Mijiritsky, Željka Perić Kačarević, Larissa Steigmann

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research status and prospects of biodegradable magnesium-based metal guided bone regeneration membranes.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Akiva EladPrivate Practice, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Luka PulDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31 000, Osijek, Croatia.
Patrick RiderBotiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806, Zossen, Germany.
Svenja RoggeBotiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806, Zossen, Germany.
Frank WitteDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Straße, 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
Dražen TadićBotiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806, Zossen, Germany.
Eitan MijiritskyDepartment of Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6139001, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Željka Perić KačarevićBotiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806, Zossen, Germany. zpkacarevic@fdmz.hr.
Larissa SteigmannDepartment of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Division of Periodontology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Carl Zeiss (Germany) · DEUniversity of Osijek · HRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHarvard University · USTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this case series was to demonstrate the use of a magnesium membrane for repairing the perforated membrane in both direct and indirect approaches, as well as its application in instances where there has been a tear of the Schneiderian membrane. CASE PRESENTATION: The case series included four individual cases, each demonstrating the application of a magnesium membrane followed by bone augmentation using a mixture of xenograft and allograft material in the sinus cavity. In the first three cases, rupture of Schneiderian membrane occurred as a result of tooth extraction, positioning of the dental implant, or as a complication during the procedure. In the fourth case, Schneiderian membrane was perforated as a result of the need to aspirate a polyp in the maxillary sinus. In case one, 10 mm of newly formed bone is visible four months after graft placement. Other cases showed between 15 and 20 mm of newly formed alveolar bone. No residual magnesium membrane was seen on clinical inspection. The vertical and horizontal augmentations proved stable and the dental implants were placed in the previously grafted sites.

conclusionWithin the limitations of this case series, postoperative clinical examination, and panoramic and CBCT images demonstrated that resorbable magnesium membrane is a viable material for sinus lift and Schneiderian membrane repair. The case series showed successful healing and formation of new alveolar bone with separation of the oral cavity and maxillary sinus in four patients.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsMagnesiumDental Implantation, EndosseousHumansMaxillary SinusNasal MucosaOsteogenesisDental ImplantsMagnesiumBarrier membranesNOVAMag membraneRegenerative dentistryResorbable metalSchneiderian membraneSinus lift augmentation

Identifiers

PMID38097992
PMCPMC10722874
OpenAlexW4389721854

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.