ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023
Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Remotely Delivered and Web-Based Interventions on Depression Severity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mental health · 2026Trial
- Comparing Midline and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.Hospital pediatrics · 2025Trial
- AI-based multimodal integration of genomics and electronic health records.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Nurses and Nursing Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Article
- Harnessing Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Data to Improve Asthma Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Impacts of epic MyChart and healthy planet on clinical care measures: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Assessment of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization Scores and Readmission Risk in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- Family Medicine in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Perspectives, Directions, and Future Opportunities; A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Early radiation effects on immediate breast reconstruction: A comparative analysis of 15- and 5-fraction postmastectomy radiotherapy regimens.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Postoperative Bleeding Definitions as the Foundation of Hemostasis in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI humanizers and the crisis of information integrity: implications for scientific writing.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Implementation of a best practice advisory alert for inpatient frailty screening and intervention: A pilot quality improvement program.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2026Article
- A problem of Epic proportion.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Evaluating ambient artificial intelligence documentation: effects on work efficiency, documentation burden, and patient-centered care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Biomarker-concordant Steroid use in Hospitalized Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Prospective Cohort Study.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the entire blood transfusion process with and without a clinical decision support system: a retrospective before-and-after study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization and validation of electronic medical record data for pharmacoepidemiologic research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- SMART: a new patient similarity estimation framework for enhanced predictive modeling in acute kidney injury.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) enable health data exchange across interconnected systems from varied settings. Epic is among the 5 leading EHR providers and is the most adopted EHR system across the globe. Despite its global reach, there is a gap in the literature detailing how EHR systems such as Epic have been used for health care research.
objectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to synthesize the available literature on use cases of the Epic EHR for research in various areas of clinical and health sciences.
methodsWe used established scoping review methods and searched 9 major information repositories, including databases and gray literature sources. To categorize the research data, we developed detailed criteria for 5 major research domains to present the results.
resultsWe present a comprehensive picture of the method types in 5 research domains. A total of 4669 articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers at each stage, while 206 articles were abstracted. Most studies were from the United States, with a sharp increase in volume from the year 2015 onwards. Most articles focused on clinical care, health services research and clinical decision support. Among research designs, most studies used longitudinal designs, followed by interventional studies implemented at single sites in adult populations. Important facilitators and barriers to the use of Epic and EHRs in general were identified. Important lessons to the use of Epic and other EHRs for research purposes were also synthesized.
conclusionsThe Epic EHR provides a wide variety of functions that are helpful toward research in several domains, including clinical and population health, quality improvement, and the development of clinical decision support tools. As Epic is reported to be the most globally adopted EHR, researchers can take advantage of its various system features, including pooled data, integration of modules and developing decision support tools. Such research opportunities afforded by the system can contribute to improving quality of care, building health system efficiencies, and conducting population-level studies. Although this review is limited to the Epic EHR system, the larger lessons are generalizable to other EHRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.