ArticleScientific reports2023
Effective processing pipeline PACE 2.0 for enhancing chest x-ray contrast and diagnostic interpretability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- XVertNet: Unsupervised Contrast Enhancement of Vertebral Structures with Dynamic Self-Tuning Guidance and Multi-Stage Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Angio-fusion net: dual-stream enhanced VGG16 attention U-Net for vessel morphology preservation in XCA segmentation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Optimized exposer region-based modified adaptive histogram equalization method for contrast enhancement in CXR imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Preprocessing is an essential task for the correct analysis of digital medical images. In particular, X-ray imaging might contain artifacts, low contrast, diffractions or intensity inhomogeneities. Recently, we have developed a procedure named PACE that is able to improve chest X-ray (CXR) images including the enforcement of clinical evaluation of pneumonia originated by COVID-19. At the clinical benchmark state of this tool, there have been found some peculiar conditions causing a reduction of details over large bright regions (as in ground-glass opacities and in pleural effusions in bedridden patients) and resulting in oversaturated areas. Here, we have significantly improved the overall performance of the original approach including the results in those specific cases by developing PACE2.0. It combines 2D image decomposition, non-local means denoising, gamma correction, and recursive algorithms to improve image quality. The tool has been evaluated using three metrics: contrast improvement index, information entropy, and effective measure of enhancement, resulting in an average increase of 35% in CII, 7.5% in ENT, 95.6% in EME and 13% in BRISQUE against original radiographies. Additionally, the enhanced images were fed to a pre-trained DenseNet-121 model for transfer learning, resulting in an increase in classification accuracy from 80 to 94% and recall from 89 to 97%, respectively. These improvements led to a potential enhancement of the interpretability of lesion detection in CXRs. PACE2.0 has the potential to become a valuable tool for clinical decision support and could help healthcare professionals detect pneumonia more accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.