Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38110512›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Effective processing pipeline PACE 2.0 for enhancing chest x-ray contrast and diagnostic interpretability.

Giulio Siracusano, Aurelio La Corte, Annamaria Giuseppina Nucera, Michele Gaeta, Massimo Chiappini, Giovanni Finocchio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giulio SiracusanoDepartment of Electric, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy. giuliosiracusano@gmail.com.
Aurelio La CorteDepartment of Electric, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.
Annamaria Giuseppina NuceraUnit of Radiology, Department of Advanced Diagnostic-Therapeutic Technologies, "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Via Giuseppe Melacrino, 21, 89124, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Michele GaetaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Dental and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Massimo ChiappiniIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143, Rome, Italy. massimo.chiappini@ingv.it.
Giovanni FinocchioIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143, Rome, Italy. gfinocchio@unime.it.
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia · ITUniversity of Catania · ITAzienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca J45F21000460001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preprocessing is an essential task for the correct analysis of digital medical images. In particular, X-ray imaging might contain artifacts, low contrast, diffractions or intensity inhomogeneities. Recently, we have developed a procedure named PACE that is able to improve chest X-ray (CXR) images including the enforcement of clinical evaluation of pneumonia originated by COVID-19. At the clinical benchmark state of this tool, there have been found some peculiar conditions causing a reduction of details over large bright regions (as in ground-glass opacities and in pleural effusions in bedridden patients) and resulting in oversaturated areas. Here, we have significantly improved the overall performance of the original approach including the results in those specific cases by developing PACE2.0. It combines 2D image decomposition, non-local means denoising, gamma correction, and recursive algorithms to improve image quality. The tool has been evaluated using three metrics: contrast improvement index, information entropy, and effective measure of enhancement, resulting in an average increase of 35% in CII, 7.5% in ENT, 95.6% in EME and 13% in BRISQUE against original radiographies. Additionally, the enhanced images were fed to a pre-trained DenseNet-121 model for transfer learning, resulting in an increase in classification accuracy from 80 to 94% and recall from 89 to 97%, respectively. These improvements led to a potential enhancement of the interpretability of lesion detection in CXRs. PACE2.0 has the potential to become a valuable tool for clinical decision support and could help healthcare professionals detect pneumonia more accurately.

Indexed as

COVID-19PneumoniaCOVID-19 TestingHumansThoraxTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID38110512
PMCPMC10728198
OpenAlexW4389862048

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.