Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38113062›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2023

The Effectiveness of Strategies to Improve User Engagement With Digital Health Interventions Targeting Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Overweight and Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alice Grady, Nicole Pearson, Hannah Lamont, Lucy Leigh, Luke Wolfenden, Courtney Barnes, Rebecca Wyse, Meghan Finch, Matthew Mclaughlin, Tessa Delaney and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alice GradySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-5340
Nicole PearsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2677-2327
Hannah LamontSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3688-566X
Lucy LeighData Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5198-8843
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-3868
Courtney BarnesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-910X
Rebecca WyseSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4872-2112
Meghan FinchSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-1705
Matthew MclaughlinTelethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-8556
Tessa DelaneySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2756-4821
Rachel SutherlandSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0470-7663
Rebecca HodderSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-0907
Sze Lin YoongSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-017X
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUDeakin University · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health interventions (DHIs) are effective in improving poor nutrition, physical inactivity, overweight and obesity. There is evidence suggesting that the impact of DHIs may be enhanced by improving user engagement. However, little is known about the overall effectiveness of strategies on engagement with DHIs.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the overall effectiveness of strategies to improve engagement with DHIs targeting nutrition, physical activity, and overweight or obesity and explore associations between strategies and engagement outcomes. The secondary aim was to explore the impact of these strategies on health risk outcomes.

methodsThe MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Academic Source Complete databases were searched up to July 24, 2023. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that evaluated strategies to improve engagement with DHIs and reported on outcomes related to DHI engagement (use or user experience). Strategies were classified according to behavior change techniques (BCTs) and design features (eg, supplementary emails). Multiple-variable meta-analyses of the primary outcomes (usage and user experience) were undertaken to assess the overall effectiveness of strategies. Meta-regressions were conducted to assess associations between strategies and use and user experience outcomes. Synthesis of secondary outcomes followed the "Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis" guidelines. The methodological quality and evidence was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool respectively.

resultsOverall, 54 studies (across 62 publications) were included. Pooled analysis found very low-certainty evidence of a small-to-moderate positive effect of the use of strategies to improve DHI use (standardized mean difference=0.33, 95% CI 0.20-0.46; P<.001) and very low-certainty evidence of a small-to-moderate positive effect on user experience (standardized mean difference=0.29, 95% CI 0.07-0.52; P=.01). A significant positive association was found between the BCTs social support (effect size [ES]=0.40, 95% CI 0.14-0.66; P<.001) and shaping knowledge (ES=0.39, 95% CI 0.03-0.74; P=.03) and DHI use. A significant positive association was found among the BCTs social support (ES=0.70, 95% CI 0.18-1.22; P=.01), repetition and substitution (ES=0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.53; P=.03), and natural consequences (ES=0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.53; P=.02); the design features email (ES=0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.53; P=.02) and SMS text messages (ES=0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.57; P=.01); and DHI user experience. For secondary outcomes, 47% (7/15) of nutrition-related, 73% (24/33) of physical activity-related, and 41% (14/34) of overweight- and obesity-related outcomes reported an improvement in health outcomes.

conclusionsAlthough findings suggest that the use of strategies may improve engagement with DHIs targeting such health outcomes, the true effect is unknown because of the low quality of evidence. Future research exploring whether specific forms of social support, repetition and substitution, natural consequences, emails, and SMS text messages have a greater impact on DHI engagement is warranted.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42018077333; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=77333.

Indexed as

Digital HealthOverweightExerciseHumansNutritional StatusObesitydigital health interventionsengagementnutritionobesityphysical activitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38113062
PMCPMC10762625
OpenAlexW4389947662

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.