Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117331›Full record

ArticleHNO2024

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with head and neck cancer in Brandenburg and Berlin].

Julia Carré, Beatrice Herzog, Daniela Reil, Constanze Schneider, Maren Pflüger, Madlen Löbel, Michael Herzog

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia CarréKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum, Thiemstr. 111, 03048, Cottbus, Deutschland.
Beatrice HerzogKlinisch-epidemiologisches Krebsregister Brandenburg-Berlin gGmbH, Dreifertstr. 12, 03044, Cottbus, Deutschland.
Daniela ReilKlinisch-epidemiologisches Krebsregister Brandenburg-Berlin gGmbH, Dreifertstr. 12, 03044, Cottbus, Deutschland.
Constanze SchneiderKlinisch-epidemiologisches Krebsregister Brandenburg-Berlin gGmbH, Dreifertstr. 12, 03044, Cottbus, Deutschland.
Maren PflügerKlinisch-epidemiologisches Krebsregister Brandenburg-Berlin gGmbH, Dreifertstr. 12, 03044, Cottbus, Deutschland.
Madlen LöbelInterdisziplinäre Studienzentrale des Carl-Thiem-Klinikums, Thiemstr. 111, 03048, Cottbus, Deutschland.
Michael HerzogKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum, Thiemstr. 111, 03048, Cottbus, Deutschland. m.herzog@ctk.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-0331
Krebsregister Saarland · DECarl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on potential limitations to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with head and neck tumours has not yet been adequately investigated. There are contradictory data on this subject. Data from larger patient collectives do not exist for Germany so far.

objectiveThe aim of the survey was to clarify in a large cohort whether the COVID-19 pandemic had an influence on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with head and neck tumours.

methodsA retrospective data analysis of the reporting data of the Clinical and Epidemiological Cancer Registry of Brandenburg and Berlin (Klinisch-epidemiologischen Krebsregisters Brandenburg-Berlin, KKRBB) of 4831 cases with head and neck tumours from 2018 to 2020 was performed. The period before April 01, 2020, was evaluated as a prepandemic cohort and compared with the cases of the pandemic cohort from April 1, 2020, until December 31, 2020, in terms of patient-related baseline data, tumour location, tumour stage, tumour board and treatments administered.

resultsNo differences were observed between the prepandemic and pandemic cohorts with regard to patient-related baseline data, tumour localisation and tumour stage. Likewise, no temporal delay in diagnosis, tumour board and treatment was evident during the pandemic period. On the contrary, the time interval between diagnosis and start of therapy was shortened by an average of 2.7 days in the pandemic phase. Tumours with T4 stage were more frequently treated surgically during the pandemic compared to the period before (20.8% vs. 29.6%), whereas primary radio(chemo)therapy decreased during the pandemic (53.3% vs. 40.4%). For all other tumour stages and entities, there were no differences in treatment.

conclusionContrary to initial speculation that the COVID-19 pandemic may have led to a decrease in tumour cases, larger tumour stages at initial presentation and a delay in diagnosis and treatment, the cohort studied for Brandenburg and Berlin showed neither a delay in tumour treatment nor an increase in tumour size and stage at initial presentation. The treatments performed, however, were subject to a change in favour of surgery and it remains to be seen whether this trend will be maintained in the long term.

Indexed as

COVID-19Head and Neck NeoplasmsBerlinCOVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesCancer centreCancer registryDelayEffectENT

Identifiers

PMID38117331
OpenAlexW4389992615

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.