Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126019›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Characterization of

Samuela Palombieri, Marco Bonarrigo, Alessandro Cammerata, Giulia Quagliata, Stefania Astolfi, Domenico Lafiandra, Francesco Sestili, Stefania Masci

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Traditional MoroccanFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Digital PCR for the Authentication of KAMUTFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuela PalombieriDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Marco BonarrigoDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Alessandro CammerataCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Rome, Italy.
Giulia QuagliataDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Stefania AstolfiDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Domenico LafiandraDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Francesco SestiliDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Stefania MasciDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Università degli Studi della Tuscia · ITCereal Research Centre · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wheat is a staple food, with the two most common species being Methods: In this work, different accessions of these three subspecies of Results: These analyses allowed the identification, in particular, of a Polish wheat accession showing better technological performances, a higher amount of positive micro- and macro-elements, and a lower amount of toxic cadmium. The modern variety Svevo and the Polish Pol2 showed the lowest and the highest shoot:root ratio, respectively. The high shoot:root ratio in Pol2 was mainly attributable to the decrease in root growth. Although Pol2 had a lower root biomass, its particular root morphology made it more efficient for nutrient uptake, as evident from the greater accumulation of micro- and macro-nutrients. Discussion: These results underline that it is not possible to draw general conclusions about the difference between primitive and modern wheats, but rather a case-by-case approach should be chosen.

Indexed as

fibermicronutrientsroot traitstechnological qualityTriticum durumTriticum polonicumTriticum turanicumTriticum turgidum

Identifiers

PMID38126019
PMCPMC10731273
OpenAlexW4389393063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.