Trial reportCancer2024
NRG-GY012: Randomized phase 2 study comparing olaparib, cediranib, and the combination of cediranib/olaparib in women with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic endometrial cancer.
Trial report in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03660826 (A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Single-Agent Olaparib, Single Agent Cediranib, and the Combinations of Cediranib/Olaparib, Olaparib/Durvalumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Single-Agent Olaparib, Single Agent Cediranib, and the Combinations of Cediranib/Olaparib, Olaparib/Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Cediranib/Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Olaparib/AZD5363 (Capivasertib) in Women With Recurrent, Persistent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer. A Multi-Arm Trial for Women With Recurrent or Persistent Endometrial Cancer
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Combined With Cediranib in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib vs. placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer.Gynecologic oncology · 2025Trial
- A phase 2 trial exploring the significance of homologous recombination status in patients with platinum sensitive or platinum resistant relapsed ovarian cancer receiving combination cediranib and olaparib.Gynecologic oncology · 2024Trial
- Clinical outcome and biomarker assessments of a multi-centre phase II trial assessing niraparib with or without dostarlimab in recurrent endometrial carcinoma.Nature communications · 2023Trial
- Review
- Cediranib with weekly paclitaxel or olaparib versus weekly paclitaxel for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (COPELIA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial in the UK.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Vascular Protection of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in the Combination Therapy With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Pathway Inhibitors.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Antitumor activity of rucaparib plus PLX038A in serous endometrial carcinoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- The Role of Immunotherapy in MMR-Deficient Endometrial Carcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The role of molecular subtypes and immune infiltration characteristics based on disulfidptosis-related genes in ovarian cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- PARP inhibitors in non-ovarian gynecologic cancers.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- Current Evidence-Based Systemic Therapy for Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2023Review
- A rapidly evolving landscape: immune checkpoint inhibitors in pretreated metastatic endometrial cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Review
- Current and Emerging Prognostic Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis paper reports the efficacy of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with the antiangiogenesis agent cediranib compared with cediranib alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.
methodsThis was open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03660826). Eligible patients had recurrent endometrial cancer, received at least one (<3) prior lines of chemotherapy, and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by histology (serous vs. other) to receive cediranib alone (reference arm), olaparib, or olaparib and cediranib for 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Homologous repair deficiency was explored using the BROCA-GO sequencing panel.
resultsA total of 120 patients were enrolled and all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median age was 66 (range, 41-86) years and 47 (39.2%) had serous histology. Median progression-free survival for cediranib was 3.8 months compared with 2.0 months for olaparib (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.91-2.3] p = .935) and 5.5 months for olaparib/cediranib (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.43-1.14] p = .064). Four patients receiving the combination had a durable response lasting more than 20 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hypertension in the cediranib (36%) and olaparib/cediranib (33%) arms, fatigue (20.5% olaparib/cediranib), and diarrhea (17.9% cediranib). The BROCA-GO panel results were not associated with response.
conclusionThe combination of cediranib and olaparib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy; however, the primary end point of the study was not met. The combination was safe without unexpected toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.