Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129112›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2024

SUMMIT-FA: a new resource for improved transcriptome imputation using functional annotations.

Hunter J Melton, Zichen Zhang, Chong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hunter J MeltonDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, 214 Rogers Building, 117 N. Woodward Avenue, Tallahassee, FL 32306, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8692-7178
Zichen ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 7007 Bertner Avenue, Unit 1689, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Chong WuDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 7007 Bertner Avenue, Unit 1689, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

Funding

Novel Statistical Methods for Multi-omics Data Integration in Alzheimer's DiseaseR03AG070669 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRADLEY, JONATHAN RAY, WU, CHONG · 2021 to 2022
$296k
NCI NIH HHSNHGRI NIH HHSNHLBI NIH HHSNIA NIH HHS R03 AG070669NIDA NIH HHSNIH HHS R03 AG070669NIMH NIH HHSNINDS NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) integrate gene expression prediction models and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify gene-trait associations. The power of TWAS is determined by the sample size of GWAS and the accuracy of the expression prediction model. Here, we present a new method, the Summary-level Unified Method for Modeling Integrated Transcriptome using Functional Annotations (SUMMIT-FA), which improves gene expression prediction accuracy by leveraging functional annotation resources and a large expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) summary-level dataset. We build gene expression prediction models in whole blood using SUMMIT-FA with the comprehensive functional database MACIE and eQTL summary-level data from the eQTLGen consortium. We apply these models to GWAS for 24 complex traits and show that SUMMIT-FA identifies significantly more gene-trait associations and improves predictive power for identifying "silver standard" genes compared to several benchmark methods. We further conduct a simulation study to demonstrate the effectiveness of SUMMIT-FA.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyTranscriptomeComputer SimulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LocieQTL Predictionfunctional annotationslow-heritability GenesTWAS

Identifiers

PMID38129112
PMCPMC10954367

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.