Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129846›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Harm reduction in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a systematic scoping review.

Kelsey R Smith, Nina K Shah, Abby L Adamczyk, Lara C Weinstein, Erin L Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsey R SmithUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. kelseysmith@health.ucsd.edu.
Nina K ShahSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, #100, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Abby L AdamczykScott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Lara C WeinsteinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St, Curtis Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Erin L KellyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St, Curtis Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · USLos Angeles Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use increasingly contributes to early morbidity and mortality, which necessitates greater preparation of the healthcare workforce to mitigate its harm. The purpose of this systematic scoping review is to: 1) review published curricula on harm reduction for substance use implemented by undergraduate (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) in the United States and Canada, 2) develop a framework to describe a comprehensive approach to harm reduction medical education, and 3) propose additional content topics for future consideration.

methodsPubMed, Scopus, ERIC: Education Resources Information Center (Ovid), and MedEdPORTAL were searched. Studies included any English language curricula about harm reduction within UME or GME in the United States or Canada from 1993 until Nov 22, 2021. Two authors independently reviewed and screened records for data extraction. Data were analyzed on trainee population, curricula objectives, format, content, and evaluation.

resultsTwenty-three articles describing 19 distinct educational programs across the United States were included in the final sample, most of which created their own curricula (n = 17). Data on educational content were categorized by content and approach. Most programs (85%) focused on introductory substance use knowledge and skills without an understanding of harm reduction principles. Based on our synthesis of the educational content in these curricula, we iteratively developed a Harm Reduction Educational Spectrum (HRES) framework to describe curricula and identified 17 discrete content topics grouped into 6 themes based on their reliance on harm reduction principles.

conclusionsHarm reduction is under-represented in published medical curricula. Because the drug supply market changes rapidly, the content of medical curricula may be quickly outmoded thus curricula that include foundational knowledge of harm reduction principles may be more enduring. Students should be grounded in harm reduction principles to develop the advanced skills necessary to reduce the physical harm associated with drugs while still simultaneously recognizing the possibility of patients' ongoing substance use. We present the Harm Reduction Educational Spectrum as a new framework to guide future healthcare workforce development and to ultimately provide the highest-quality care for patients who use drugs.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateSubstance-Related DisordersCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateHarm ReductionHumansStudentsUnited StatesGraduate medical educationHarm reductionOpioid use disorderSubstance useUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID38129846
PMCPMC10734177
OpenAlexW4390052103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.