Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132079›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effectiveness of the Combined Use of a Brain-Machine Interface System and Virtual Reality as a Therapeutic Approach in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Amaranta De Miguel-Rubio, Ignacio Gallego-Aguayo, Maria Dolores De Miguel-Rubio, Mariana Arias-Avila, David Lucena-Anton, Alvaro Alba-Rueda

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amaranta De Miguel-RubioDepartment of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physiotherapy, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4504-4088
Ignacio Gallego-AguayoDepartment of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physiotherapy, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Maria Dolores De Miguel-RubioIlerna Private Teaching Center, 14011 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-4489-7365
Mariana Arias-AvilaPhysical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Paulo 13565-905, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5081-5326
David Lucena-AntonDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-5342
Alvaro Alba-RuedaDepartment of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physiotherapy, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9188-4427
University of Córdoba · ESUniversidad de Cádiz · ESUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury has a major impact on both the individual and society. This damage can cause permanent loss of sensorimotor functions, leading to structural and functional changes in somatotopic regions of the spinal cord. The combined use of a brain-machine interface and virtual reality offers a therapeutic alternative to be considered in the treatment of this pathology. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the combined use of virtual reality and the brain-machine interface in the treatment of spinal cord injuries. A search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Scopus, and Medline, including articles published from the beginning of each database until January 2023. Articles were selected based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the risk of bias and the PEDro scale and SCIRE systems were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Eleven articles were selected from a total of eighty-two. Statistically significant changes were found in the upper limb, involving improvements in shoulder and upper arm mobility, and weaker muscles were strengthened. In conclusion, most of the articles analyzed used the electroencephalogram as a measurement instrument for the assessment of various parameters, and most studies have shown improvements. Nonetheless, further research is needed with a larger sample size and long-term follow-up to establish conclusive results regarding the effect size of these interventions.

Indexed as

brain–computer interfacesrehabilitationspinal cord injuriesvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38132079
PMCPMC10742447
OpenAlexW4389916899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.