Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132653›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2023

Deep Learning Paradigm and Its Bias for Coronary Artery Wall Segmentation in Intravascular Ultrasound Scans: A Closer Look.

Vandana Kumari, Naresh Kumar, Sampath Kumar K, Ashish Kumar, Sanagala S Skandha, Sanjay Saxena, Narendra N Khanna, John R Laird, Narpinder Singh, Mostafa M Fouda and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vandana KumariSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India.
Naresh KumarDepartment of Applied Computational Science and Engineering, G L Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida 201310, India.
Sampath Kumar KSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India.
Ashish KumarSchool of CSET, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3466-8845
Sanagala S SkandhaDepartment of CSE, CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 501401, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3535-5613
Sanjay SaxenaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 751003, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8288-1010
Narendra N KhannaDepartment of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India.
John R LairdHeart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA.
Narpinder SinghDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India.
Mostafa M FoudaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-8640
Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100 Cagliari, Italy.
Rajesh SinghDepartment of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3164-8905
Jasjit S SuriStroke Diagnostics and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and motivationCoronary artery disease (CAD) has the highest mortality rate; therefore, its diagnosis is vital. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a high-resolution imaging solution that can image coronary arteries, but the diagnosis software via wall segmentation and quantification has been evolving. In this study, a deep learning (DL) paradigm was explored along with its bias.

methodsUsing a PRISMA model, 145 best UNet-based and non-UNet-based methods for wall segmentation were selected and analyzed for their characteristics and scientific and clinical validation. This study computed the coronary wall thickness by estimating the inner and outer borders of the coronary artery IVUS cross-sectional scans. Further, the review explored the bias in the DL system for the first time when it comes to wall segmentation in IVUS scans. Three bias methods, namely (i) ranking, (ii) radial, and (iii) regional area, were applied and compared using a Venn diagram. Finally, the study presented explainable AI (XAI) paradigms in the DL framework. FINDINGS AND

conclusionsUNet provides a powerful paradigm for the segmentation of coronary walls in IVUS scans due to its ability to extract automated features at different scales in encoders, reconstruct the segmented image using decoders, and embed the variants in skip connections. Most of the research was hampered by a lack of motivation for XAI and pruned AI (PAI) models. None of the UNet models met the criteria for bias-free design. For clinical assessment and settings, it is necessary to move from a paper-to-practice approach.

Indexed as

AI biascoronary artery diseasedeep learningintravascular ultrasoundUNetwall segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38132653
PMCPMC10743870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.