Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136337›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies.

Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring disparities in adherence to colorectal cancer clinical practice guidelines and associated survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A laminin α4-CD8Oncoimmunology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyo Seon RyuDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2606-9973
Jin KimDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6479-9673
Ye Ryung ParkDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hae ChoDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Min ChooDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Seon KimDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Se-Jin BaekDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-8777
Jung-Myun KwakDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Korea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess recurrence patterns and related risk factors following curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center, including 2622 patients with stage I-III CRC who underwent curative resection between 2008 and 2018. Hazard rates of recurrence were calculated using a hazard function. The primary outcome was the peak recurrence time after curative resection and secondary outcomes were prognostic factors associated with recurrence. Over a median follow-up period of 53 months, the overall, locoregional and systemic recurrence rates were 8.9%, 0.7%, and 8.5%, respectively. Recurrence rates were significantly higher for rectal cancer (14.9% overall, 4.4% locoregionally, and 12.3% systemically) than for colon cancer (all

Indexed as

colorectal cancerliver metastasislung metastasisperitoneal metastasisrecurrencerisk factorssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID38136337
PMCPMC10742009
OpenAlexW4389545761

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.