Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137062›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Cognition, Anxiety, and Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals: A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Nathalia Oliveira Rodrigues, Anna Alice Vidal Bravalhieri, Tatiane Pereira de Moraes, Jorge Aparecido Barros, Juliana Hotta Ansai, Gustavo Christofoletti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Combining transcranial electrical stimulation with training in older adults: Effects on dual-task ability.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalia Oliveira RodriguesInstitute of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande 79060-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-1820
Anna Alice Vidal BravalhieriInstitute of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande 79060-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5512-7338
Tatiane Pereira de MoraesInstitute of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande 79060-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-3473
Jorge Aparecido BarrosDepartment of Physical Therapy, Dom Bosco Catholic University (UCDB), Campo Grande 79117-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2813-644X
Juliana Hotta AnsaiDepartment of Gerontology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCAR), São Carlos 13565-905, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-3509
Gustavo ChristofolettiInstitute of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande 79060-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7879-239X
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversidade Católica Dom Bosco · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior FC001Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul PROAP/UFMS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has gained popularity as a method of modulating cortical excitability in people with physical and mental disabilities. However, there is a lack of consensus on its effectiveness in older individuals. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 2-month tDCS program for improving physical and mental performance in community-dwelling older individuals. In this single-blinded, controlled clinical trial, forty-two participants were allocated to one of three groups: (1) the tDCS group, which received, twice a week, 20 min sessions of 2 mA electric current through electrodes placed on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; (2) the tDCS-placebo group, which underwent the same electrode placement as the tDCS group but without actual electric stimulation; and (3) the cognitive-control group, which completed crossword puzzles. Main outcome measures were cognition, mobility, and anxiety. Multivariate analyses of variance were employed. Significance was set at 5% (

Indexed as

aginganxietycognitioncontrolled clinical trialgaittranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38137062
PMCPMC10741841
OpenAlexW4388867192

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.