ReviewBiomedicines2023
Advancements in Understanding and Classifying Chronic Orofacial Pain: Key Insights from Biopsychosocial Models and International Classifications (ICHD-3, ICD-11, ICOP).
Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Disease Categories: The Adaptive Hierarchical Domain Network (AHDN) for Precision Phenotyping and Personalized Management of Chronic Orofacial Pain.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of oral health-related quality of life in temporomandibular disorders: implications for nurse-led stratified care.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Can Large Artificial Intelligence-Based Linguistic Models Help to Obtain Information About Burning Mouth Syndrome?Oral diseases · 2026Article
- Pharmacological management in orofacial pain: a retrospective, observational study of treatment decisions and contributing factors.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Observational
- Burning mouth syndrome: updates on pathogenesis and diagnostic algorithms.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025Review
- The interplay of sleep disorders and orofacial pain: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- From Biomarkers to Behavior: Mapping the Neuroimmune Web of Pain, Mood, and Memory.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Oral Dysaesthetic and Perceptual Disorder, A Distinct Subset of Chronic Orofacial Pain Without Burning Symptoms: A Case-Control Study.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Altered Brain Functional Connectivity and Neurometabolite Correlations in Orofacial Chronic Pain with Central Sensitization.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Orofacial migraine and neurovascular orofacial pain-new insights into characteristics and classification.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2024Article
- The Impact of C-3 Side Chain Modifications on Kynurenic Acid: A Behavioral Analysis of Its Analogs in the Motor Domain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In exploring chronic orofacial pain (COFP), this review highlights its global impact on life quality and critiques current diagnostic systems, including the ICD-11, ICOP, and ICHD-3, for their limitations in addressing COFP's complexity. Firstly, this study outlines the global burden of chronic pain and the importance of distinguishing between different pain types for effective treatment. It then delves into the specific challenges of diagnosing COFP, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced approach that incorporates the biopsychosocial model. This review critically examines existing classification systems, highlighting their limitations in fully capturing COFP's multifaceted nature. It advocates for the integration of these systems with the DSM-5's Somatic Symptom Disorder code, proposing a unified, multidisciplinary diagnostic approach. This recommendation aims to improve chronic pain coding standardization and acknowledge the complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors in COFP. In conclusion, here, we highlight the need for a comprehensive, universally applicable classification system for COFP. Such a system would enable accurate diagnosis, streamline treatment strategies, and enhance communication among healthcare professionals. This advancement holds potential for significant contributions to research and patient care in this challenging field, offering a broader perspective for scientists across disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.