Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38141252›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Responses to Real-World and Hypothetical E-Cigarette Flavor Bans Among US Young Adults Who Use Flavored E-Cigarettes.

Jamie Tam, Evelyn Jimenez-Mendoza, John Buckell, Jody Sindelar, Rafael Meza

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Toxicity and Appeal of Flavoured E-Cigarettes and Flavour Ban Outcomes: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jamie TamDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8353-4259
Evelyn Jimenez-MendozaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John BuckellHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4157-4217
Jody SindelarDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1741-5451
Rafael MezaDepartment of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-5037
Yale University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Yale Center for the Study of Tobacco Product Use and Addiction (YCSTP) Project 2: Addictive Threshold of Nicotine and the Impact of SweetenersU54DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LISA M FUCITO · 2018 to 2026
$41.6M
Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Theodore Levy · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention, Early Detection and Treatment InterventionsU01CA253858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2020 to 2025
$8.4M
Health and economic impact analysis of a reduced nicotine cigarette policy on vulnerable populationsK01DA056424 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie Pearl Tam · 2022 to 2026
$829k
FDA Center for Tobacco ProductsNCI NIH HHS U01 CA253858NCI NIH HHS U01CA253858NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA056424NIDA NIH HHS U54CA229974NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarette flavor bans could reduce or exacerbate population health harms. To determine how US e-cigarette flavor restrictions might influence tobacco use behavior, this study assesses responses to real-world and hypothetical flavor bans among young adults who use flavored e-cigarettes. AIMS AND

methodsAn online, national survey of young adults ages 18-34 who use flavored e-cigarettes was conducted in 2021 (n = 1253), oversampling states affected by e-cigarette flavor restrictions. Participants were asked about their responses to real-world changes in the availability of flavored e-cigarettes. Unaffected participants were asked to predict their responses under a hypothetical federal e-cigarette flavor ban.

resultsThe most common response to real-world changes in flavored e-cigarettes availability was to continue vaping (~80%). Among those who exclusively vaped, 12.5% switched to combustible tobacco. Quitting all forms of tobacco was selected by 5.3% of those exclusively vape versus 4.2% who dual use. Under a hypothetical federal ban, more than half of respondents stated they would continue vaping; 20.9% and 42.5% of those who exclusively vape versus dual use would use combustible tobacco. Quitting all tobacco products was endorsed by 34.5% and 17.2% of those who exclusively vape versus dual use.

conclusionsYoung adults who vape flavored e-cigarettes have mixed responses to e-cigarette flavor bans. Under both real-world and hypothetical e-cigarette flavor bans, most who use flavored e-cigarettes continue vaping. Under a real-world ban, the second most common response among those who exclusively vape is to switch to smoking; under a hypothetical federal ban, it is to quit all tobacco. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first national survey to directly ask young adults who use flavored e-cigarettes about their responses to real-world changes in flavored e-cigarette availability due to state and local flavor restrictions. The survey also asked individuals to predict their responses under a hypothetical federal e-cigarette flavor ban. Most who use flavored e-cigarettes would continue vaping following e-cigarette flavor restrictions, but many would switch to or continue using combustible tobacco, highlighting potential negative public health consequences of these policies. Policymakers must consider the impact of e-cigarette flavor bans on both e-cigarette and cigarette use.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFlavoring AgentsVapingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultFlavoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID38141252
PMCPMC11260892
OpenAlexW4390140071

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.