ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2024
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and cardiovascular disease risk: a Mendelian randomisation study.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Article
- Causal effects of gestational hypertension on women's health: A Mendelian randomization analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, maternal cardiovascular disease mortality and the role of familial predisposition: a Norwegian population-based sibling-comparison, sibling-spillover and negative-control cohort study.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Polygenic Risk for Pre-Eclampsia and the Long-Term Risk of Incident Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Preterm Birth and Maternal Cardiovascular Risk.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Women's heart disease research in the netherlands: angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and beyond.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025Review
- Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and cardiovascular disease risk: a genetic epidemiological study.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Risk During Pregnancy: Scoping Review on the Clinical Implications and Long-Term Consequences.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Chain effect of lifecourse reproductive characteristics and body fat and muscle on cardiovascular disease in women: a Mendelian randomization study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Coronary Artery Disease Risk: A Negative Control Mendelian Randomization Study.Circulation · 2025Article
- Adverse pregnancy outcomes and coronary artery disease risk: A negative control Mendelian randomization study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveObservational studies show that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) are related to unfavourable maternal cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles later in life. We investigated whether genetic liability to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and gestational hypertension is associated with CVD risk factors and occurrence of CVD events.
methodsWe obtained genetic associations with HDPs from a genome-wide association study and used individual participant data from the UK Biobank to obtain genetic associations with CVD risk factors and CVD events (defined as myocardial infarction or stroke). In our primary analysis, we applied Mendelian randomisation using inverse-variance weighted regression analysis in ever pregnant women. In sensitivity analyses, we studied men and nulligravidae to investigate genetic liability to HDPs and CVD risk without the ability to experience the underlying phenotype.
resultsOur primary analysis included 221 155 ever pregnant women (mean age 56.8 (SD 7.9) years) with available genetic data. ORs for CVD were 1.20 (1.02 to 1.41) and 1.24 (1.12 to 1.38) per unit increase in the log odds of genetic liability to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and gestational hypertension, respectively. Furthermore, genetic liability to HDPs was associated with higher levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and younger age at hypertension diagnosis. Sensitivity analyses revealed no statistically significant differences when comparing the findings with those of nulligravidae and men.
conclusionsGenetic liability to HDPs is associated with higher CVD risk, lower blood pressure levels and earlier hypertension diagnosis. Our study suggests similar findings in ever pregnant women, nulligravidae and men, implying biological mechanisms relating to HDPs are causally related to CVD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.