Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150430›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Predictors of non-adherence to antihypertensive medications: A cross-sectional study from a regional hospital in Afghanistan.

Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai, Mohammad Hashim Wafa, Essa Tawfiq, Massoma Jafari, Cua Ngoc Le, Abdul Wahed Wasiq, Bilal Ahmad Rahimi, Ahmad Haroon Baray, Temesgen Anjulo Ageru, Charuai Suwanbamrung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Patients in the Republic of Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Muhammad Haroon StanikzaiPublic Health Research Program, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Thai Buri, Thailand.
Mohammad Hashim WafaFaculty of Medicine, Neuropsychiatric and Behavioral science Department, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3170-3599
Essa TawfiqThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Massoma JafariMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Cua Ngoc LePublic Health Research Program, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Thai Buri, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5634-7669
Abdul Wahed WasiqFaculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan.
Bilal Ahmad RahimiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6630-5742
Ahmad Haroon BarayFaculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan.
Temesgen Anjulo AgeruPublic Health Research Program, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Thai Buri, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9440-2622
Charuai SuwanbamrungPublic Health Research Program, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Thai Buri, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2318-4570
Kandahar University · AFWalailak University · THMcMaster University · CAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-adherence to antihypertensive medications (AHMs) is a widespread problem. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality reduction is possible via better adherence rates among hypertensive patients.

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of non-adherence to AHMs and its predictors among hypertensive patients who attended Mirwais Regional Hospital in Kandahar, Afghanistan.

methodsA cross-sectional study using random sampling method was conducted among hypertensive patients, aged ≥18 years in Mirwais Regional Hospital at a 6-month follow-up between October and December 2022. To assess non-adherence to AHMs, we employed the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence scale. A value below or equal to 80% of the total score was used to signify non-adherence. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of non-adherence to AHMs.

resultsWe used data from 669 patients and found that 47.9% (95%CI: 44.1-51.8%) of them were non-adherent to AHMs. The majority (71.2%) of patients had poorly controlled blood pressure (BP). The likelihood of non-adherence to AHMs was significantly higher among patients from low monthly-income households [Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.70 (95%CI: 1.13-2.55)], those with daily intake of multiple AHMs [AOR 2.02 (1.29-3.16)], presence of comorbid medical conditions [AOR 1.68 (1.05-2.67), lack of awareness of hypertension-related complications [AOR 2.40 (1.59-3.63)], and presence of depressive symptoms [AOR 1.65 (1.14-2.38)].

conclusionNon-adherence to AHMs was high. Non-adherence to AHMs is a potential risk factor for uncontrolled hypertension and subsequent cardiovascular complications. Policymakers and clinicians should implement evidence-based interventions to address factors undermining AHMs adherence in Afghanistan.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionAdolescentAdultAfghanistanCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansMedication AdherenceAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID38150430
PMCPMC10752561
OpenAlexW4390264981

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.