Evidence mapPaperPMID 38150456Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Predicting preterm birth using explainable machine learning in a prospective cohort of nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women.

Wasif Khan, Nazar Zaki, Nadirah Ghenimi, Amir Ahmad, Jiang Bian, Mohammad M Masud, Nasloon Ali, Romona Govender, Luai A Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wasif KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Nazar ZakiDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Nadirah GhenimiDepartment Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-0897-2587
Amir AhmadDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Mohammad M MasudDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Nasloon AliInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Romona GovenderDepartment Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Luai A AhmedZayed Centre for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
United Arab Emirates University · AEUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm birth (PTB) presents a complex challenge in pregnancy, often leading to significant perinatal and long-term morbidities. "While machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown promise in PTB prediction, the lack of interpretability in existing models hinders their clinical utility. This study aimed to predict PTB in a pregnant population using ML models, identify the key risk factors associated with PTB through the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm, and provide comprehensive explanations for these predictions to assist clinicians in providing appropriate care. This study analyzed a dataset of 3509 pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates and selected 35 risk factors associated with PTB based on the existing medical and artificial intelligence literature. Six ML algorithms were tested, wherein the XGBoost model exhibited the best performance, with an area under the operator receiving curves of 0.735 and 0.723 for parous and nulliparous women, respectively. The SHAP feature attribution framework was employed to identify the most significant risk factors linked to PTB. Additionally, individual patient analysis was performed using the SHAP and the local interpretable model-agnostic explanation algorithms (LIME). The overall incidence of PTB was 11.23% (11 and 12.1% in parous and nulliparous women, respectively). The main risk factors associated with PTB in parous women are previous PTB, previous cesarean section, preeclampsia during pregnancy, and maternal age. In nulliparous women, body mass index at delivery, maternal age, and the presence of amniotic infection were the most relevant risk factors. The trained ML prediction model developed in this study holds promise as a valuable screening tool for predicting PTB within this specific population. Furthermore, SHAP and LIME analyses can assist clinicians in understanding the individualized impact of each risk factor on their patients and provide appropriate care to reduce morbidity and mortality related to PTB.

Indexed as

Premature BirthArtificial IntelligenceCalcium CompoundsCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningOxidesParityPregnancyPregnant PeopleProspective StudiesCalcium CompoundslimeOxides

Identifiers

PMID38150456
PMCPMC10752564
OpenAlexW4390264730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.