Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153307›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2024

Computational modeling of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis: toward clinical translation.

Natalia A Trayanova, Aurore Lyon, Julie Shade, Jordi Heijman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex-specific virtual population for the prediction and assessment of arrhythmia risk.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia A TrayanovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8661-063X
Aurore LyonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6019-7376
Julie ShadeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Jordi HeijmanDepartment of Cardiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1418-108X
Johns Hopkins University · USMaastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Artificial intelligence analysis of atrial remodeling evolution in patients with atrial fibrillation: Towards optimal ablation strategiesR01HL166759 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Eugene Kholmovski, David Spragg · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Infarct-related Ventricular Tachycardia Mechanisms: From Micro to ClinicalR01HL142496 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2019 to 2022
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL142496NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL166759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity of cardiac electrophysiology, involving dynamic changes in numerous components across multiple spatial (from ion channel to organ) and temporal (from milliseconds to days) scales, makes an intuitive or empirical analysis of cardiac arrhythmogenesis challenging. Multiscale mechanistic computational models of cardiac electrophysiology provide precise control over individual parameters, and their reproducibility enables a thorough assessment of arrhythmia mechanisms. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of models of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, from the single cell to the organ level, and how they can be leveraged to better understand rhythm disorders in cardiac disease and to improve heart patient care. Key issues related to model development based on experimental data are discussed, and major families of human cardiomyocyte models and their applications are highlighted. An overview of organ-level computational modeling of cardiac electrophysiology and its clinical applications in personalized arrhythmia risk assessment and patient-specific therapy of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias is provided. The advancements presented here highlight how patient-specific computational models of the heart reconstructed from patient data have achieved success in predicting risk of sudden cardiac death and guiding optimal treatments of heart rhythm disorders. Finally, an outlook toward potential future advances, including the combination of mechanistic modeling and machine learning/artificial intelligence, is provided. As the field of cardiology is embarking on a journey toward precision medicine, personalized modeling of the heart is expected to become a key technology to guide pharmaceutical therapy, deployment of devices, and surgical interventions.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacModels, CardiovascularAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansMyocytes, CardiacTranslational Research, Biomedicalarrhythmiasatrial fibrillationcardiac electrophysiologycomputational modelingsudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID38153307
PMCPMC11381036
OpenAlexW4390339624

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.