Evidence mapPaperPMID 38156550Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl in REDUCE-IT USA: Results From Patients Randomized in the United States.

William S Weintraub, Deepak L Bhatt, Zugui Zhang, Sarahfaye Dolman, William E Boden, Adam P Bress, Brandon K Bellows, Catherine G Derington, Sephy Philip, Gabriel Steg and 6 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT01492361. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01492361 phase3completed

Evaluation of the Effect of AMR101 on Cardiovascular Health and Mortality in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients With Cardiovascular Disease or at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With EPA - Intervention Trial)

Ran2011Enrolled8,179Registered outcomes10Posted comparisons10ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsAMR101, Placebo, Statin therapy
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

William S WeintraubMedStar Healthcare Delivery Research Network MedStar Health Research Institute Washington DC USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-5571
Deepak L BhattMount Sinai Heart Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System New York NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-6245
Zugui ZhangInstitute for Research on Equity and Community Health Christiana Care Health System Newark DE USA.
Sarahfaye DolmanMedStar Healthcare Delivery Research Network MedStar Health Research Institute Washington DC USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3651-9069
William E BodenCardiology Section, Department of Medicine Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System Boston MA USA.
Adam P BressDivision of Health System Innovation and Research, Intermountain Healthcare Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2259-5039
Brandon K BellowsDepartment of Medicine Columbia University New York NY USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-6047
Catherine G DeringtonDivision of Health System Innovation and Research, Intermountain Healthcare Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7382-4607
Sephy PhilipAmarin Pharma, Inc Bridgewater NJ USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-8125
Gabriel StegMedical School of Université de Paris-Cité Paris France.ORCID 0000-0001-6896-2941
Michael MillerDepartment of Medicine Corporal Michael J Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-2095
Eliot A BrintonUtah Lipid Center Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9807-4010
Terry A JacobsonLipid Clinic and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Program, Department of Medicine Emory University Atlanta GA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9926-2179
Jean-Claude TardifMontreal Heart Institute Université de Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-8983
Christie M BallantyneDepartment of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-1730
Paul KolmCenter of Biostatistics, Informatics and Data Science MedStar Health Research Institute Washington DC USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2653-5452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 3146 REDUCE-IT USA (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl Intervention Trial USA) participants, icosapent ethyl (IPE) reduced first and total cardiovascular events by 31% and 36%, respectively, over 4.9 years of follow-up. METHODS AND

resultsWe used participant-level data from REDUCE-IT USA, 2021 US costs, and IPE costs ranging from $4.59 to $11.48 per day, allowing us to examine a range of possible medication costs. The in-trial analysis was participant-level, whereas the lifetime analysis used a Markov model. Both analyses considered value from a US health sector perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (incremental costs divided by incremental quality-adjusted life-years) of IPE compared with standard care (SC) was the primary outcome measure. There was incremental gain in quality-adjusted life-years with IPE compared with SC using in-trial (3.28 versus 3.13) and lifetime (10.36 versus 9.83) horizons. Using an IPE cost of $4.59 per day, health care costs were lower with IPE compared with SC for both in-trial ($29 420 versus $30 947) and lifetime ($216 243 versus $219 212) analyses. IPE versus SC was a dominant strategy in trial and over the lifetime, with 99.7% lifetime probability of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. At a medication cost of $11.48 per day, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was $36 208 in trial and $9582 over the lifetime.

conclusionsIn this analysis, at $4.59 per day, IPE offers better outcomes than SC at lower costs in trial and over a lifetime and is cost-effective at $11.48 per day for conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds. Treatment with IPE should be strongly considered in US patients like those enrolled in REDUCE-IT USA. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01492361.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHealth Care CostsCost-Benefit AnalysisEicosapentaenoic AcidHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited StatesEicosapentaenoic Acideicosapentaenoic acid ethyl estercardiovascular preventioncost‐effectivenesshyperlipidemia

Identifiers

PMID38156550
PMCPMC10863822

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.