ArticleSleep medicine: X2023
Effectiveness of Narval CC™ device in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of a novel one visit 3D-printed titratable interlocking mandibular advancement device for patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular advancement devices (MAD) are used in sleep apnea with varying results. We aimed to examine whether or not a MAD should be an integral treatment modality in the care of our patients with obstructive sleep apnea. We designed a feasibility study and included 32 patients after meeting inclusion criteria. Only 3 patients did not finish the second sleep study exam. The intervention was an individually designed MAD and a sleep study exam was performed prior and post treatment. The outcome objective was an apnea-hypopnea index of under 10 and with a 50% reduction. Patient population had a baseline AHI of 19.0 and mean reduction of AHI with MAD treatment to 13.3 yielding a MAD efficacy rate of 31% when outcome objectives were applied. The average reduction in AHI was 24.8% with 9 of the 29 patients actually experiencing an increase in AHI with MAD treatment. When there was a reduction in AHI using the MAD device the AHI reduction rate was 49.1% and there was a tendency for better treatment outcome when apnea-hypopnea was predominantly supine. A mandibular advancement device serves as an important treatment modality in the care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea due to patient satisfaction and compliance. The broad range of treatment response to our MAD device highlights the importance of performing a sleep study exam after initiation of treatment with a MAD but also illustrates the complexity and need for individually tailored treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.