Evidence mapPaperPMID 38172539Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of COVID-19 containment measures on perceived health and health-protective behavior: a longitudinal study.

Warner van Kersen, Myrna M T de Rooij, Lützen Portengen, Nekane Sandoval Diez, Inka Pieterson, Marjan Tewis, Jolanda M A Boer, Gerard Koppelman, Judith M Vonk, Roel Vermeulen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Warner van KersenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Myrna M T de RooijInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lützen PortengenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nekane Sandoval DiezInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inka PietersonInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marjan TewisInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jolanda M A BoerCentre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gerard KoppelmanDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology and Paediatric Allergology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Judith M VonkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roel VermeulenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ulrike GehringInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anke Huss *Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lidwien A M Smit *Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. l.a.smit@uu.nl.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

ZonMw 85200001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This longitudinal study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 containment measures on perceived health, health protective behavior and risk perception, and investigate whether chronic disease status and urbanicity of the residential area modify these effects. Participants (n = 5420) were followed for up to 14 months (September 2020-October 2021) by monthly questionnaires. Chronic disease status was obtained at baseline. Urbanicity of residential areas was assessed based on postal codes or neighborhoods. Exposure to containment measures was assessed using the Containment and Health Index (CHI). Bayesian multilevel-models were used to assess effect modification of chronic disease status and urbanicity by CHI. CHI was associated with higher odds for worse physical health in people with chronic disease (OR = 1.09, 95% credibility interval (CrI) = 1.01, 1.17), but not in those without (OR = 1.01, Crl = 0.95, 1.06). Similarly, the association of CHI with higher odds for worse mental health in urban dwellers (OR = 1.31, Crl = 1.23, 1.40) was less pronounced in rural residents (OR = 1.20, Crl = 1.13, 1.28). Associations with behavior and risk perception also differed between groups. Our study suggests that individuals with chronic disease and those living in urban areas are differentially affected by government measures put in place to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. This highlights the importance of considering vulnerable subgroups in decision making regarding containment measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremChronic DiseaseHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesPandemics

Identifiers

PMID38172539
PMCPMC10764319
OpenAlexW4390547021

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.