Direct mechanical thrombectomy versus bridging therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Bridging therapy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of real-world evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
   Pooled it
2. Real-World Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke Interventions in Older Patients: A Cohort Study from a Tertiary Medical Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
3. Integrated predictors of outcome in vertebrobasilar artery occlusion treated With endovascular therapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as