Evidence mapPaperPMID 38178045Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2024

The effect of exercise training and motivational counselling on physical activity behaviour and psychosocial factors in pregnant women: secondary analyses of the FitMum randomised controlled trial investigating prenatal physical activity.

Signe de Place Knudsen, Caroline Borup Roland, Saud Abdulaziz Alomairah, Anne Dsane Jessen, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Jane M Bendix, Tine D Clausen, Ellen Løkkegaard, Bente Stallknecht, Stig Molsted

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Signe de Place KnudsenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. signedpi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7058-9568
Caroline Borup RolandDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Saud Abdulaziz AlomairahDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Dsane JessenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle Terkildsen MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jane M BendixDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerod, Denmark.
Tine D ClausenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerod, Denmark.
Ellen LøkkegaardDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerod, Denmark.
Bente StallknechtDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig MolstedDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerod, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKSaudi Electronic University · SASteno Diabetes Centers · DK

Funding

Wellcome Trust 061017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA physically active lifestyle is beneficial during pregnancy. However, little is known about physical activity (PA) behaviour and psychosocial factors in women during and after pregnancy. This study examined exercise behavioural regulation, exercise self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, sickness absence and musculoskeletal pain in pregnant women offered either structured supervised exercise training, motivational counselling on PA, or standard prenatal care in the FitMum randomised controlled trial.

methodsTwo hundred and eighteen healthy inactive pregnant women were randomised to structured supervised exercise training (n = 87), motivational counselling on PA (n = 86) or standard prenatal care (n = 45). The women answered the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2), the Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (P-ESES-DK) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) at baseline (gestational age (GA) of max 15 weeks), GA 28 and 34 weeks, and one year after delivery. Sickness absence and low back and/or pelvic girdle pain were likewise reported in questionnaires at baseline and GA 28 weeks.

resultsParticipants offered structured supervised exercise training or motivational counselling on PA had higher autonomous motivation for exercise during pregnancy compared with participants receiving standard prenatal care (e.g., difference in intrinsic regulation at GA 28 weeks, structured supervised exercise training vs. standard prenatal care: mean difference in score 0.39 [0.16; 0.64], p < 0.001). Participants offered structured supervised exercise training also had higher exercise self-efficacy during pregnancy (e.g., GA 28 weeks, structured supervised exercise training vs. standard prenatal care: mean difference in score 6.97 [2.05; 12.02], p = 0.005). All participants reported high exercise self-efficacy at baseline and medium exercise self-efficacy during pregnancy and one year after delivery. No differences were found between groups in health-related quality of life, sickness absence or low back and/or pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy. No group differences were found one year after delivery.

conclusionStructured supervised exercise training and motivational counselling on PA had important effects on autonomous exercise motivation during pregnancy. Exercise self-efficacy was also increased with structured supervised exercise training compared to standard prenatal care. No group differences in health-related quality of life, sickness absence, or pain were found during and after pregnancy. No effects were found one year post-delivery after intervention cessation.

trial registrationThe study was approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics (#H-18011067) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (#P-2019-512). The study adheres to the principles of the Helsinki declaration. Written informed consent was obtained at inclusion.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingPelvic Girdle PainExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyPregnant PeopleQuality of LifeBehavioural regulation in exerciseFitMumHealth-related quality of lifeLow back painMaternal exercise interventionsPelvic girdle painPhysical activityPregnancySelf-efficacySick leave

Identifiers

PMID38178045
PMCPMC10768443
OpenAlexW4390577219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.