ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Effect of intracranial electrical stimulation on dynamic functional connectivity in medically refractory epilepsy.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Static and dynamic intracerebral signal analysis reveals protective networks against seizures in drug-resistant focal epilepsy.Brain communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the distributed network effects of intracranial electrical stimulation in patients with medically refractory epilepsy using dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) and graph indicators. Methods: The time-varying connectivity patterns of dFC (state-based metrics) as well as topological properties of static functional connectivity (sFC) and dFC (graph indicators) were assessed before and after the intracranial electrical stimulation. The sliding window method and Results: DFCs were clustered into two connectivity configurations: a strongly connected state (state 1) and a sparsely connected state (state 2). After electrical stimulation, the dwell time and occupancy rate of state 1 decreased, while that of state 2 increased. Connectivity strengths of both state 1 and state 2 decreased. For graph indicators, the clustering coefficient, k-core, global efficiency, and local efficiency of patients showed a significant decrease, but the brain networks of patients exhibited higher modularity after electrical stimulation. Especially, for state 1, there was a significant decrease in functional connectivity strength after stimulation within and between the frontal lobe and temporary lobe, both of which are associated with the seizure onset. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that intracranial electrical stimulation significantly changed the time-varying connectivity patterns and graph indicators of the brain in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Specifically, the electrical stimulation decreased functional connectivity strength in both local-level and global-level networks. This might provide a mechanism of understanding for the distributed network effects of intracranial electrical stimulation and extend the knowledge of the pathophysiological network of medically refractory epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.