Evidence mapPaperPMID 38183116Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2024

Diagnosis and management of infertility: NICE-adapted guidelines from the Italian Society of Human Reproduction.

Stefano Palomba, Paola Viganò, Sandrine Chamayou, Zaira Donarelli, Maria Paola Costantini, Roberto Marci, Paola Piomboni, Egidio Fino, Luigi Montano, Antonino Guglielmino and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stefano PalombaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. prof.stefano.palomba@gmail.com.
Paola ViganòInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Sandrine ChamayouHERA Center, Unit of Reproductive Medicine (U.M.R.), Sant'Agata Li Battiati, Catania, Italy.
Zaira DonarelliPsychological Counselling Service, University of Palermo, Palermo, and Clinical Psychology Unit, ANDROS Day Surgery Clinic, Palermo, Italy.
Maria Paola CostantiniItalian Society of Human Reproduction, SIRU, Rome, Italy.
Roberto MarciDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Paola PiomboniDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Egidio FinoItalian Society of Human Reproduction, SIRU, Rome, Italy.
Luigi MontanoUnit and Service of Lifestyle Medicine in Uro-Andrology, Local Health Authority of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Antonino GuglielminoHERA Center, Unit of Reproductive Medicine (U.M.R.), Sant'Agata Li Battiati, Catania, Italy.
Edgardo SomiglianaInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
and the SIRU Working Group on Italian Guideline for Infertility

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Italy the fertility rate is very low, and an increasing number of patients are infertile and require treatments. The Italian Law concerning the safety of patient care, and the professional liability of health professionals, indicates that health professionals must comply with the recommendations set out in the guidelines developed by public and private bodies and institutions, as well as scientific societies and technical-scientific associations of the health professions, except for specific cases. Unfortunately, no guideline for the diagnosis and the management of infertility is currently available in Italy. In 2019, the Italian Society of Human Reproduction pointed out the need to produce Italian guidelines and subsequently approved the establishment of a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional working group (MMWG) to develop such a guideline. The MMWG was representative of 5 scientific societies, one national federation of professional orders, 3 citizens' and patients' associations, 5 professions (including lawyer, biologist, doctor, midwife, and psychologist), and 3 medical specialties (including medical genetics, obstetrics and gynecology, and urology). The MMWG chose to adapt a high-quality guideline to the Italian context instead of developing one from scratch. Using the Italian version of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II scoring system, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines were selected and adapted to the Italian context. The document was improved upon by incorporating comments and suggestions where needed. This study presents the process of adaptation and discusses the pros and cons of the often-neglected choice of adapting rather than developing new guidelines.

Indexed as

GynecologyInfertilityBirth RateFemaleHumansItalyPregnancyReproductionARTsGuidelinesInfertilityIVFManagementSterility

Identifiers

PMID38183116
PMCPMC10768082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.